0
Atheism
Atheism is the disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods.
1,002 Questions
God is a mystery even to the spirits.
God’s powers are immeasurable and unimaginable. He didn’t want to stay idle with all of his powers. He had created many planets and at last he had got the idea of creating the earth. Those planets are empty while earth rotates filled with many kinds of creatures. After creating the human beings, God might have thought that he had entangled himself in a great responsibility. He had created spirits too for various purposes. He is creating new spirits even now. The possession of these spirits cause new developments on this earth.
I guess God's character is somewhat different from what religions usually think. God's involvement in humans' personal affairs is very rare. God is responsible for what he had created on this earth and human beings are responsible for what they have created on this earth. The religions' teachings and preachings might have made people to think about God in a different angle. They must learn to think about him in a right angle. The relationship between God and human beings is just like a relationship between a scientist and his robots. Humans must think scientifically too. If God wants to do everything himself then why must he create medicinal herbs, plants and science for physical health and moral and discipline for mental health of human kind. Human beings must know the ways to rule themselves on this earth. He is always ready to grant intelligence and all that human beings need. He is always creating new spirits on this earth and make new developments on this earth.
God can determine the life of the human beings but he never does it. Only spirits determine the life of the human beings from their (humans') daily activities, talks and thoughts too.
God never bothers whether people believe in him or not. God's direct intervention in individuals' affairs is very rare. God doesn't watch each and every human being at the same time and cannot live with each and everyone to guide them. These works are done by the spirits. God had created different kinds of spirits for various purposes. He had made the spirits to watch, guide and determine the destiny of the human beings from their daily activities, talks and thoughts too. Your past determines your present and your present determines your future. God has given freewill to all creatures including human beings. According to this, all human beings have all right to live a life as they wish. But if it happens to be bad and hurts someone, they have to face the consequences. These consequences are created by spirits. It's a natural system. After death no one lives in any form. Heaven and hell are only for spirits, not for human beings. God is a mystery even to the spirits. Spirits are not eternal beings but their lifetime is long. Spirits are separate elements. A human being during his/her lifetime is living with many spirits which have joined one by one since birth. They are knowledge, skills, feelings, emotions, instincts, interests and everything. Further there will be always some spirits with you on behalf of your parents, friends, relatives and Gods you believe. Only these spirits make you remember them in a certain situations. All of these spirits are your consciousnesses and memories. Even thoughts are not your own. For example, when you want to take a decision on a subject, one after another the spirits think and you just listen, choose or reject the ideas which they transmit to your mind through your brain in the form of thoughts. A mind is a group/formation of many spirits which have joined one by one since birth. A mind is just like a computer's mind. After the computer is completely destroyed you will not get its mind. The same is the case with the human beings. A brain is a device used by the spirits to control the body and mind. (A senior spirit or a chief can control other spirits) A human being doesn't have a spiritual body. Soul is an energy needed for the functionality of a body. It is not a spirit or anything else. A body's functionality is based on the auto mechanism. After death all spirits which accompanied a person quit and go to different places searching new bodies. No one lives after death in any form. All human beings are just robots made of flesh and bones and toys of the spirits for their games.
I am a living evidence for the existence of God. If you know me, you will understand.
At present all creatures including human beings are living in a miraculous era of God. This is a temporary miracle of God. I am connected to all creatures including human beings and spirits internally by God since year 1950 but I am not a God. I think that all human beings can see what I see, can hear what I hear and even know my thoughts. But thoughts are complicated matter. It needs an explanation. The people who have born in this era cannot realize this miracle because they have born with it. An old brave and honest gentleman aged 85 can explain about this miracle.
The Zuni people were primarily sedentary due to their agricultural lifestyle, which revolved around the cultivation of crops such as corn, beans, and squash in the arid environment of the American Southwest. Their permanent settlements, characterized by multi-storied adobe dwellings, allowed them to efficiently manage water resources and protect their communities from external threats. Additionally, their rich cultural and spiritual practices were closely tied to the land, reinforcing the importance of remaining in one location. This combination of agriculture, community cohesion, and cultural significance contributed to their permanence.
What is the Similar word for atheist?
A similar word for "atheist" is "nonbeliever." Both terms refer to individuals who do not believe in the existence of a deity or deities. Other related terms include "agnostic," which describes someone who is uncertain about the existence of a god, though it is not strictly synonymous with atheism.
What is the focus of humanistic theories?
Humanistic theories focus on individual potential and the importance of personal growth, self-actualization, and subjective experiences. They emphasize the inherent goodness of people and the belief that individuals have the capacity for self-direction and creativity. Central figures like Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow advocate for understanding human behavior through a lens of empathy and holistic perspective, prioritizing the individual's experience and personal values. This approach contrasts with more deterministic views, highlighting the importance of free will and the search for meaning in life.
What is a traditional clothes for atheism?
Atheism, as a belief system that does not adhere to theism or religious practices, does not have traditional clothing associated with it. Atheists come from diverse cultural backgrounds and often wear the same clothing as those in their respective societies. Some might choose to wear apparel with secular or skeptical messages, but there is no specific attire that represents atheism universally.
What are some examples of humanistic theories?
Humanistic theories emphasize individual potential and personal growth, focusing on concepts such as self-actualization and holistic understanding of the person. Key examples include Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, which outlines a progression of human motivations from basic needs to self-fulfillment, and Carl Rogers' Person-Centered Therapy, which emphasizes empathy, authenticity, and unconditional positive regard in fostering personal development. These theories contrast with more deterministic psychological approaches by highlighting free will and the inherent goodness of people.
How many atheists live in Europe?
The number of atheists in Europe varies by country, but surveys indicate that a significant portion of the population identifies as non-religious or atheist. For example, in countries like the Czech Republic and Sweden, around 30-50% of people may identify as atheists or non-religious. Overall, estimates suggest that approximately 10-20% of the European population identifies as atheist, with higher rates in Western and Northern Europe compared to Eastern Europe.
What is Jean-Paul Sartre's first principle of his atheistic existentialism?
Jean-Paul Sartre's first principle of atheistic existentialism is encapsulated in the idea that "existence precedes essence." This means that individuals are not born with a predetermined nature or purpose; instead, they must create their own essence through choices and actions. In the absence of a divine creator, humans bear the responsibility for defining their own values and meaning in life, emphasizing the importance of personal freedom and authenticity.
Is David Walliams theists or atheists?
David Walliams has not publicly identified himself as either a theist or an atheist. He has expressed a range of views on religion and spirituality in various interviews, suggesting a complex relationship with these concepts. However, without a definitive statement from him, it remains unclear where he stands on this issue.
There is no definitive proof of atheism, as it is the absence of belief in a god or gods. Atheism is a lack of belief in the existence of deities, rather than a claim that no gods exist. It is based on skepticism and the lack of evidence for the existence of a higher power.
What are the most compelling atheist proofs against the existence of a higher power?
Atheists often argue against the existence of a higher power by pointing to the lack of empirical evidence, the presence of suffering and evil in the world, and the inconsistencies in religious texts. They also question the need for a higher power to explain the universe, as science can provide natural explanations for many phenomena.
No, atheists are not necessarily hypocrites simply for not believing in a god or gods. Hypocrisy is when someone's actions contradict their stated beliefs or values, and being an atheist does not automatically make someone hypocritical.
Tuck Everlasting what would happen if nothing ever died?
Oh, dude, if nothing ever died in "Tuck Everlasting," we'd have a serious overpopulation issue on our hands. Like, can you imagine all those immortal beings just chilling on Earth forever? It'd be like a never-ending party that no one can leave. Sounds fun until you realize you're stuck with the same people for eternity.
The Bible does not tell us what exactly there will be. We know that we will be with God and his followers, and that people will worship him. Answer: The view of Christianity is as above with some dissenting voices such as Mark Twain who wrote of Heaven in "Letters From Earth", describing it as a very dull place and not at all satisfying. There are other thoughts depending on your religion (see Link): * Vikings: Valhalla (heaven) for death in battle a rollicking drinking party; Hel (peaceful place) for most * Many Eastern Religions: Reincarnation until enlightenment then a satisfying non- existence * Christian Science: Not a place "... but a divine state of Mind in which all the manifestations of Mind are harmonious and immortal." * Epicureanism: No afterlife. The soul dissolves at death. * Ancient Greeks: A shadowy existence without end
* Islam: An eternity of pleasurable experience * Jehovah's Witnesses: Some go to Heaven some stay on the "New Earth" * Judaism: VAried belief from no Heaven/Hell to life in the world to come (conditions not specified) * Rastafari: A return to Eden * Wicca: A permanent walk in the park in "Summerland"
How do atheists believe the world was made?
There is no set atheist belief for how the world was created. Atheism is just a lack of belief in any deity. Thus an atheist will not believe that a deity was involved in the formation of the earth. Atheists would in all likelihood all subscribe to one of the many scientific theories about the origins of the universe and the resulting origin of the earth. That means, they (we) would take a naturalistic view on its origins: The Big Bang Theory, "M" Theory, and so forth.
Atheism is not a religion.There is no unifying belief, only a unifying lack of belief. So atheists do not all actually 'believe in' anything. Atheists do not share beliefs or morals nor is there a code of belief for atheism. Therefore, while some atheists may believe Earth was formed from the sun as science dictates, and some can believe aliens made Earth, 'atheists' in general have no general "beliefs'.
Atheists generally rely on science to explain the natural world. They do not create myths to explain things that cannot be explained yet.
Is it possible that demonic extraterrestrials could have fabricated dinosaur fossils?
No. Why would anyone do that? And then just leave them lying buried in difficult-to-reach places? It didn't happen.
AnswerYes, this is possible. But not likely. It is also possible that they were put there by pixies. Or that cats are really highly intelligent and faked them as part of a complex practical joke on humans that they are still keeping quiet about until it is time for the punchline. It is also possible that the whole world didn't exist yesterday, but a mad alien scientist made it appear this morning at 3am: and we all popped into existence, complete with memories of yesterday (and before) and dinasour fossils in the ground and in museums.
It is also possible that a god pulled a similar trick a few thousand years ago (or even this morning at 3am).
However, there is no evidence to suggest that any of these possibilities are true - or even remotely likely. So most people don't give them serious consideration. Because if you gave one of them serious consideration, you'd have to consider all the other possibilities as well, and say that they are equally likely.
But you can never disprove these possibilities, because they are not testable. So as ideas they do not have much value.
AnswerIt may be possible if you consider that maybe extraterrestrials do exist, and that they may be a form of demon, and that they fabricated dinosaur fossils that appeared prehistoric. If extraterrestrials do exist, we have to take into consideration about how advanced their technology is, and to what extent that they can fabricate specific materials. If the extraterrestrials do exist and they are actually a form of demon, they would do it in order to to fulfill Satan's agenda in deceiving the world. There have been many claimed sightings of dinosaurs all around the world that are still alive today, such as pterodactyls, and even some claimed sightings of tyrannosaurus rex's in some remote places of the world, and the Loch Ness Monster (which is supposedly a plesiosaur), and there's also many other dinosaurs that there's been claimed sightings of all around the world.
AnswerIf you believe that, you'll believe anything.
Lead is not considered rare in the Earth's crust, as it is relatively abundant. However, most of the lead found in the environment comes from human activities such as mining and industrial processes, leading to environmental concerns due to its toxicity.
Did Stephen Jay Gould say that fossil evidence completely contradicts natural selection?
Answer 1
Although Gould was often quote-mined by creationists suggesting that Gould thought that the fossil evidence did not support common descent, none of this relates in any way to natural selection, the proposed mechanism for evolution.
Answer 2
No. Stephen Jay Gould said that natural selection was the best explanation for the evolution of species. However, he differed from Charles Darwin in his understanding of the process.
Whereas Darwin appears to have expected that evolution would be a gradual, continuous process, Gould suggested a process of punctuated equilibrium. He said that species were more likely to have remained relatively unchanged for long periods until a period of rapid evolution resulted in the evolution of new species. He felt that this was more consistent with the fossil record.
Answer 3
As a palaeontologist by profession this was Gould's area of expertise. Although revered as a great scientist Gould has received some attention from creationists for parts of his comments on the nature of the fossil record. He is quote-mined as referring to the fossil record in relation to evolution in the following way:
"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution."
Stephen Jay Gould (Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University), 'Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging?' Paleobiology, vol.6(1), January 1980,p. 127.
"All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions between the major groups are characteristically abrupt."
Stephen Jay Gould 'The return of hopeful monsters'. Natural History, vol. LXXXVI(6), June-July 1977, p. 24.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils. Yet Darwin was so wedded to gradualism that he wagered his entire theory on a denial of this literal record:
The geological record is (here Gould is quoting Darwin) extremely imperfect and this fact will to a large extent explain why we do not find intermediate varieties, connecting together all the extinct and existing forms of life by the finest graduated steps. He who rejects these views on the nature of the geological record will rightly reject my whole theory. (end of quote)
Darwin's argument still persists as the favored escape of most paleontologists from the embarrassment of a record that seems to show so little of evolution. In exposing its cultural and methodological roots, I wish in no way to impugn the potential validity of gradualism (for all general views have similar roots). I wish only to point out that it was never "seen" in the rocks.
Paleontologists have paid an exorbitant price for Darwin's argument. We fancy ourselves as the only true students of life's history, yet to preserve our favored account of evolution by natural selection we view our data as so bad that we never see the very process we profess to study."
Stephen Jay Gould 'Evolution's erratic pace'. Natural History, vol. LXXXVI95), May 1977, p.14.
Gould's commitment to Darwinian evolution followed from an understanding and knowledge of the fossil record that belies the literal text of the quotes lifted out of context by creationists. What the evidence shows is clear from the completestatements of Gould and many other palaeontologists in their proper context, no matter what creationists make of them.
What do people in today's society put their faith and trust in when they do not have God?
those who put their faith in science...... something like the big bang can't ever be 100% proven just like god because we didn't see it happen but it is the most rational and likely situation since we have evidence to support the big bang. faith in science means accepting theories that can't be proven but that make the most sense, god is not an option since there is no evidence for god's existence.
No, not all Emos are atheists. Emo is a subculture characterized by emotional expression, fashion, and music preference. While some Emos may identify as atheists, others may hold different religious beliefs or may not adhere to any specific belief system.
How many terrorists are atheists?
It depends on how you count it.
Almost nobody has ever killed someone by being motivated by the premise that there are no gods, full-stop. This is the same way that nobody has ever killed someone by being motivated by the premise that there are gods, full-stop. However, when you talk about a certain religion, that religion will have an ideology in addition to the simple belief in gods, such as what those gods want people to do to demonstrate belief. Since Atheists do not have gods, no beliefs about what gods want are relevant.
However, most Atheists subscribe to a number of other ideologies, which can lead to terrorism and violence. Probably the most notable non-theistic ideology that some Atheists have endorsed is Communism. (This is not to say that being an Atheist makes you a Communist or more inclined to be a Communist, but since Communism has no divine components, it is perfectly compatible with Atheism, just like Democracy is for the same reasons.) Communist Terrorists are quite numerous throughout history, operating on multiple continents. However, there were numerous Theists in the ranks of Communist terrorism as well, making it difficult to parse out the exact number of Atheists who were involved. Another non-theistic ideology that Atheists have endorsed is nationalism. While there are certainly forms of nationalism which are strongly religious, such as Greek Nationalism and Religious Zionism, there have been forms of nationalism that are Atheist-friendly, such as Secular Zionism and or the OAS in the Algerian Civil War. Most of the members of the Irgun and the Lehi (also called the Stern Gang), which were Zionist terror groups, were Atheists with Jewish heritage. (Thankfully, Israel disbanded these organizations once it was clear what kinds of atrocities they were committing, but the point remains that these were mostly Atheist-led terror groups.)
However, the common canard by Atheists that Atheists have not been members of terrorist groups or repressive/violent groups is not borne out by the evidence.
How many atheists and agnostics are in the USA?
It is estimated that around 4-5% of the US population identify as atheists, meaning they do not believe in any deities. Additionally, around 6-7% identify as agnostic, meaning they are unsure or do not claim knowledge about the existence of deities.
Is Deontology a moral theory that focuses mainly on one's intentions?
Yes, deontology is a moral theory that places emphasis on the intent behind one's actions rather than the consequences. It asserts that the moral rightness of an action is determined by adherence to rules or duties, rather than the outcomes of those actions.
Is Virtue ethics a moral theory that focuses mainly on one's intentions?
It appears to be primarily focused on personal character and responses to situations, therefore similar to situation ethics. take the familiar example of finding a large amount of money in an untoward or chance position- there are all sorts of qualifying angles here. for example if I was browsing along in a book store in the shelves and happened to find a large denomination bill in a book ( this can happen easily as people often store money in books)- I would quietly pick it up and put it in my back pocket and quietly leave the store. that modulus would nor work on the street! if one found a wallet or somethiing ( dedicated_ with ID cards or address one would be obligated to report the incident to the police- perhaps taking the found items to the police station. I once had a wallet incident happen- the owner was nearby- was a woman who had motored up- from the south and the wallet slipped out of her pants pocket- as I found it near her car. naturally she was glad to get it back. One the other hand in the bookstore example- I would take the money, put it aside and quietly (Clear the Bridge). it is a sad commentary on society that so much of situation ethics is predicated on the dollar sign. anyhow that is my take.
What percentage of people are atheists?
Reliable statistics are hard to come by. Many atheists do not declare their atheism.
To further complicate the matter, some religions like Buddhism are atheistic, denying the existence of any god or gods, but many 'folk Buddhists' do believe in god. Also, Hinduism has many different strains of thought, ranging from polytheism, through to monotheism, panentheism and pantheism, and even a few atheistic schools. Unless we could ask every single person on earth whether they believe in god or not in a private setting so they'd be honest, we can't be sure how much of the worlds population is atheist.
There is no reliable statistic for the number of atheists in the world due to several factors:
- No one is interested in counting that category.
- Many people are confused by that term thinking there are varying degrees of atheism.
- There are several world-wide organized "religious" groups that do not worship a supreme being.
- There is no umbrella organization that can assist in an accurate count of that category.
- Many people do not wish to identify themselves as atheists because of the inherent prejudice against atheists by leaders and members of various Christian amd Muslim sects.
