it is a 2 (or more) stage device, the first stage is an A bomb while the remaining stage(s) contain fusion fuel. typically lithium deuteride.
the amount of fission fuel (uranium or plutonium) that can be put in an A bomb is inherently limited. if you put too much in the bomb it will spontaneously begin to fission (possibly even during assembly or storage, definitely long before use and delivery to a target is possible) causing the bomb to heat up, melt, and produce a low yield fizzle explosion; producing mostly contamination not damage. it has been computed that the limit to the yield of an A bomb is about 1 megaton, the highest yield A bomb ever tested had a yield of 500 kilotons.
the amount of fusion fuel that can be put in an H bomb has no such limit, fusion cannot begin spontaneously. also the yield can be raised by using as many stages as you want. also the fusion reaction produces many very high energy neutrons, which are capable of fissioning depleted uranium (which is not fissionable under ordinary conditions), if the outer casing/tamper of an H bomb is made of depleted uranium it is possible to raise the yield of the H bomb by up to a factor of 10. the first H bomb tested had a yield of 10 megatons. the highest yield H bomb tested had a yield of just over 50 megatons, but had it used the uranium casing/tamper it was designed for the yield was predicted to be 100 megatons.
yes its about 70 - 400 times more powerful..
A hydrogen bomb is more destructive than an atomic bomb because it has hydrogen. Hydrogen is highly flammable, and if a hydrogen bomb exploded with enough force and just enough fire, a huge wide area of a fiery explosion will occur. This is more destructive than the atomic bomb. Fire basically engulfs everything and destroys all in its path, making for an effective bomb.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong!Hydrogen does not burn in a hydrogen bomb, it fuses releasing atomic energy too. This fusion reaction is over in microseconds, much faster than combustion can start; also it reaches temperatures in the tens of millions of degrees, much hotter than any chemical fire or fission bomb. The reason a fusion bomb is usually more destructive than a fission bomb is the fusion bomb has no upper limit on yield, the fission bomb cannot be built with a yield over 1 megaton. One can just keep adding fusion stages until you get the desired yield.
An atomic bomb has more destructive potential, but a large, long-lived tornado would probably release more energy than a small nuclear weapon.
biological
more destructive than
The most destructive weapon on earth is the hydrogen bomb. These weapons are potentially thousands of times more powerful than ordinary atom bombs (which use nuclear fission rather than fusion) and could easily destroy a city in seconds.
No the atom bomb is not more powerful then the H-bomb
The H-Bomb, or Hydrogen Bomb, has never been used in warfare- the bombs dropped on japan at the end of WW2 were ATOMIC bombs, which are not as destructive. The Hydrogen Bomb is very much more powerful than the atom bomb, and has only ever been exploded in tests. For full information, Google 'US Hydrogen Bomb' and see what comes up.
More powerful explosion.
they are more destructive because they are on the suface and because they are slower
they are more destructive because they are on the suface and because they are slower
A bomb is more powerful than a bullet its obvious