answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The rotozoa, slime molds, and algae are the organisms that were later placed in the Kingdom Protista.
no

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What organisms were later placed in the kingdom protista?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Did carl linnaeus make the 5 kingdoms?

Linnaeus' original hierarchy of organism classification included only two kingdoms. Later, this would be expanded to three by Ernst Haeckel, as some single-celled organisms couldn't be classified as animal or plant. Later still, Edouard Chatton's idea for dividing between single-celled organisms with and without a distinct nucleus was popularized, leading to four kingdoms. Finally, Robert Whittaker addressed the ambiguous classification of fungi between plantae and Protista by making them their own, fifth kingdom.


How do the kingdoms of living organisms differ?

Kingdoms and domains are used to classify living things. There are 3 domains: Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryote. Within the domains, living things are sorted into Kingdoms. There are currently 5 Kingdoms protista, bacteria, archaea, plants, animals, and fungi. Previously, only the 5 kingdom system existed. Later however, the domains were added.


What is Linnaeus's significant development to modern taxonomy?

Linnaeus's contribution to taxonomy was that he expanded on Aristotle's ideas of classification. Like Aristotle, Linnaeus used observations as the basis of his system. He wrote descriptions of organisms in groups based on their observable features. Linnaeus also used his observations to devise a naming system for organisms. In Linnaeus's naming system, called binomial nomenclature, each organism is given a two-part name.


The Kingdom of Charles later became?

France - A+France - A+The kingdom of Charles later became France, according to the treaty of Verdun when Charlemagne's empire was divided among his three grandsons. The Eastern Frankish kingdom,or the kingdom of Louis, eventually became Germany. The Western Frankish Kingdom, or the Kingdom of Charles, later became France, and the area in the center was called The Kingdom of Lothaire, where Belgium and Italy stand today.


What are the main objectives of clssification?

The primary classification was a two kingdom classification which categorized all living beings as plants and animals. Later came the 5 kingdom classification as proposed by Whittaker. Actually the categorization was based on the physiological as well as Morphological characteristics of the living organisms. The prime aim of such classification was to make the study process more organised and easy. It also helps in identification and nomenclature of the organisms.


What kingdoms did the Hebrew established?

Only two: the Kingdom of Judah and the Kingdom of Israel, which later merged into Israel.


How was fish made?

By little organisms which later formed into fish later in the years such in the Prehistoric Time.


What idea of Darwin's based on fossils and the modern organisms he found basically says that genetic are inherited by later organisms?

The ideas of descent with modification are based on fossils and the modern organisms he found basically says that genetic changes are inherited by later generations.


What is the scientific names of Monera?

The scientific name for Monera was once used to refer to a biological kingdom that included prokaryotic organisms like bacteria and archaea. However, the classification of Monera is no longer widely used, as bacteria and archaea are now typically classified into separate domains: Bacteria and Archaea, respectively.


When will Kingdom Hearts III comes out?

Kingdom Hearts III doesn't come out until next year or later this year.


Why do you think they use six kingdom today?

To set out each and every animal in it own kingdom


What is the main problem with classifying protists?

Historical classificationsThe first division of the protists from other organisms came in the 1830s, when the German biologist Georg August Goldfuss introduced the word protozoa to refer to organisms such as ciliates and corals.[4] This group was expanded in 1845 to include all "unicellular animals", such as Foraminifera and amoebae. The formal taxonomic category Protoctista was first proposed in the early 1860s by John Hogg, who argued that the protists should include what he saw as primitive unicellular forms of both plants and animals. He defined the Protoctista as a "fourth kingdom of nature", in addition to the then-traditional kingdoms of plants, animals and minerals.[4] The kingdom of minerals was later removed from taxonomy by Ernst Haeckel, leaving plants, animals, and the protists as a "kingdom of primitive forms".[5]Herbert Copeland resurrected Hogg's label almost a century later, arguing that "Protoctista" literally meant "first established beings", Copeland complained that Haeckel's term protista included anucleated microbes such as bacteria. Copeland's use of the term protoctista did not. In contrast, Copeland's term included nucleated eukaryotes such as diatoms, green algae and fungi.[6] This classification was the basis for Whittaker's later definition of Fungi, Animalia, Plantae and Protista as the four kingdoms of life.[7] The kingdom Protista was later modified to separate prokaryotes into the separate kingdom of Monera, leaving the protists as a group of eukaryotic microorganisms.[8] These five kingdoms remained the accepted classification until the development of molecular phylogenetics in the late 20th century, when it became apparent that neither protists nor monera were single groups of related organisms (they were not monophyletic groups).[9]Modern classificationsCurrently, the term protist is used to refer to unicellular eukaryotes that either exist as independent cells, or if they occur in colonies, do not show differentiation into tissues.[10] The term protozoa is used to refer to heterotrophic species of protists that do not form filaments. These terms are not used in current taxonomy, and are retained only as convenient ways to refer to these organisms. The taxonomy of protists is still changing. Newer classifications attempt to present monophyletic groups based on ultrastructure, biochemistry, and genetics. Because the protists as a whole are paraphyletic, such systems often split up or abandon the kingdom, instead treating the protist groups as separate lines of eukaryotes. The recent scheme by Adl et al. (2005)[10] is an example that does not bother with formal ranks (phylum, class, etc.) and instead lists organisms in hierarchical lists. This is intended to make the classification more stable in the long term and easier to update. Some of the main groups of protists, which may be treated as phyla, are listed in the taxobox at right.[11] Many are thought to be monophyletic, though there is still uncertainty. For instance, the excavates are probably not monophyletic and the chromalveolates are probably only monophyletic if the haptophytes and cryptomonads are excluded.