answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Wegener noticed several things about the land masses on the Earth. The first being that some land masses are shaped like the pieces of a jigsaw, Africa's West coast mirroring South America's East coast for example. He looked at the rock layers in these countries and found that the rock layers were the same too. He then looked at the fossils found in the rock and found that they were the same early on in the fossil record but later changed and became more and more different. (He knew that the animals found in these countries were different in the present day.) He was intrigued as his findings would mean that the landmasses were once joined together and had later split apart into there present locations. He started to look for the fossils of tropical climate animals and plants in present day cold climate latitudes and found them. He concluded this was evidence that the land masses had moved over time.

His ideas were not well received as there was no clear way whole continents could move. The science community scoffed at his ideas as it was logically ridiculous that whole continents could move without some huge energy source to drive it. That was until the 1960's and the discovery of the mid-Atlantic ridge a series of volcanoes under the sea which are spewing out new rock a phenomenon known as ocean floor spreading. The movement of the continents is due to convection currents in the mantle driven by nuclear fusion reactions which were unheard of in Wegener's time.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What pieces evidence wegener used to back up his theory?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

Why wasn't Wegener's theory of Pangaea accepted at first?

His idea was not accepted because people back then did not believe that the plates could move. They also thought you could fall off the Earth but that is a different question. The theory was put forward first by Abraham Orthelius but was fully developed by Alfred Wegner. His theory was not thought of because people thought it was not possible for the tectonic plates of the earth to move.


What did Harry Hess do with the sea floors spreading?

The idea that the continents might have moved, or "drifted" over time can be traced back to the sixteenth century, when European cartographers compiled world maps based on the seagoing expeditions of that time. This idea was transformed into the theory of "continental drift" by German meteorologist Alfred Wegener in 1912, when he published a treatise with several lines of supporting evidence that went beyond simply matching the continents like puzzle pieces. These lines of evidence included, for example, matching geological formations and paleontological distributions from South America and Africa. Wegener's critics correctly pointed out, however, that the continents could not simply "plow" though the ocean floor as Wegener had vaguely theorized. It was Hess who determined how oceanic mountain ranges, called mid-ocean ridges, are fundamental to the tectonic movement that results in the drift of continents. Basically, he used echolocation to map the sea floor and proved that continental drift does occur.


What evidence caused Alfred Wegener to develop his hypothesis of continental drift?

One of His Theorys of continental drift was, that you could fit the continents back together if you had pictures. Also it would make up Pangea


What is Archie Carr's contribution to continental drift?

Archie Carr's proposing theory that as Brazil spread away from the Mid-Atlantic ridge and Ascension Island, the green turtle returned to the island year after year to lay eggs. The hatchlings would have to swim back further each time 2cm/yr until today when they swim back 1200 miles. I believe this to support Wegener's theory.


What was Wegners theory called?

Wegener's hypothesis (1912) is called the continental drift, in which he proposed the hypothesis that Earth's continents were moving, and that 200 MYA, there was only a big landmass called the Pangaea. Too bad he didn't have enough facts to back up this guess, so people thought he had a drug overdose or somethings and laughed him off. Wegener's hypothesis later developed into the modern theory of plate tectonics: the lithosphere is divided into plates that are constantly moving, pumping into each other and causing earth quakes.

Related questions

Why did most scientists reject wegener theory for nearly a half century?

They rejected Wegener's theory for half a century because he could not identify the cause of continental drift.


Why wasn't Wegener's theory of Pangaea accepted at first?

His idea was not accepted because people back then did not believe that the plates could move. They also thought you could fall off the Earth but that is a different question. The theory was put forward first by Abraham Orthelius but was fully developed by Alfred Wegner. His theory was not thought of because people thought it was not possible for the tectonic plates of the earth to move.


What is an explanation in science that has a lot of evidence to back it up?

I think it is theory


What is the different between postulate and theory?

A postulate is something that cannot be proven nor disproven. A theory has evidence to back it up.


What killed the dinosavrs and what evidence do you have to back up the theory?

The Chicxulub Asteroid impact caused the dinosaur extinction, evidence of which the K2 boundary illustrates.


When might a historians point of view become bias?

When the historian has no evidence to back up his theory


Why was wegener's continental drift hypothesis not widely accepted?

People thought he was crazy and not very smart but he proved them. He found a way.


Why did people think wegner's theory was wrong?

YEs, Alfred WEGners theory was accpeted until later BECause This Question IS BEing ASked to aN ELEveN yEar OLdBecaysE sHE wANTs To Know :CAN A THEORY ALREADY ACCEPTED , BE REJECTED LATER WHEN A CONTRADICTION IS FOUND?THANKSI Appreciate if you would help.ByebyeX


How does a scientific hypothesis become an accepted theory?

when there s proof to back it up with evidence or an experiment to test the hypothesis


Albert wegener theory is true?

yes because i looked at a map and tried to put the continents back together with my brain and they fit perfect and Albert Wagner had clues there was the same climates the same land formations and the same fossils that is why i think his theory is correct


What did Harry Hess do with the sea floors spreading?

The idea that the continents might have moved, or "drifted" over time can be traced back to the sixteenth century, when European cartographers compiled world maps based on the seagoing expeditions of that time. This idea was transformed into the theory of "continental drift" by German meteorologist Alfred Wegener in 1912, when he published a treatise with several lines of supporting evidence that went beyond simply matching the continents like puzzle pieces. These lines of evidence included, for example, matching geological formations and paleontological distributions from South America and Africa. Wegener's critics correctly pointed out, however, that the continents could not simply "plow" though the ocean floor as Wegener had vaguely theorized. It was Hess who determined how oceanic mountain ranges, called mid-ocean ridges, are fundamental to the tectonic movement that results in the drift of continents. Basically, he used echolocation to map the sea floor and proved that continental drift does occur.


What evidence caused Alfred Wegener to develop his hypothesis of continental drift?

One of His Theorys of continental drift was, that you could fit the continents back together if you had pictures. Also it would make up Pangea