I have been lightly researching this question for several years and am about to give it much more attention. The "exclusive remedy" laws were formulated in the early 20th century, and are antiquated by any standards. I have not found a state yet that does not have an "exclusive remedy" clause in their labor code. In other words, I believe all 50 states have this "escape from liability" for employers who carry workers compensation. However, not all states require employers to carry workers compensation. In these states the employers are able to "escape liability" if indeed they do carry workers compensation.
All states require WC, but there is some confusion because some have exemptions or because Texas makes the *insurance* voluntary. Texas is the only voluntary state. Even without coverage, the employer is responsible to the worker for job-related injuries and usually, injuries related to safe entering and exiting of the job site.
Washington and Kansas enacted the first constitutional workers' compensation laws effective March 14, 1911. They were followed by Nevada on March 24, 1911, New Jersey on April 4, 1911, California on April 8, 1911, New Hampshire on April 15, 1911 and Wisconsin on May 3, 1911. Wisconsin was the first law to go into effect (May 3, 1911), and Washington was the first compulsory law to go into effect (October 11, 1911).
dont know
Not all states require a repossession notification to be sent. Some require only that law enforcement be notified. Some states do not even require this much. Once the vehicle is repossessed in these states that have no requirement of notification, it is assumed that you know the reason your car is not where you left it the night before. This is deemed notification enough.
NO YOU DONT HAVE TO PUT THAT ON AN APPLICATION BUT IF YOUR EMPLOYER FINDS OUT YOU HAVE HAD A CLAIM CHANCES ARE YOU WILL BE DISMISSED AND HE OR SHE WONT TELL YOU HOW THEY FOUND OUT. TAKE A CHANCE AND DONT MENTION IT BUT IF YOU HAPPEN TO BE THE TYPE OF PERSON WHO FILES ALOT OF CLAIMS AGAINST COMPANIES CHANCES ARE REAL GOOD YOUR EMPLOYER WILL FIND OUT.
No unless their job has them sexually transmitting something or putting there saliva in someone no they dont have to.
To set right, often by making compensation for a wrong.
We are doing a case study of it in georgraphy and there are but it is not just ledc's but richer countries who dont get compensation for work accidents and as soon as the lease is up coca cola leaves without considering it workers hope this helped x
they dont
I heard that they dont require 1
not without rightful compensation, as said in the constitution
depends on state some states give big fines some like minnesota dont require it
tell them that you will fire them if they dont work
I dont know