Nothing, actually,as it was not a genocide per say. Yes, people were killed but it was not based on their race, religion or ethnicity. It does not follow the 8 steps of a genocide either.I live in Nepal and I think it is fair to say that all kinds of people were killed impartially by all kinds of people.However, the Maoists rebels were the main killers and they killed the non rebels so maybe that is the classification
No, the Hutu leaders did not end the system of racial classification. In fact, they exacerbated ethnic tensions by reinforcing and exploiting the divide between Hutus and Tutsis, leading to the Rwandan genocide in 1994.
Genocide Genocide
they stop the genocide at the year of 2002
The Holocaust, the Rwandan genocide and the Armenian genocide.
Genocide
The genocide symbol represents genocide. No surprises there.
Nepal = Nepal
The Holocaust, the Rwandan genocide and the Armenian genocide.
The Herero Genocide was a genocide that was fought between Namibia and the Germans
Typically, a genocide is "certified" by leading academics when a set of circumstances in the world qualifies under the definition of genocide. This is exactly what happened in the Cambodian genocide.
Yes it was.
Typically, a genocide is "certified" by leading academics when a set of circumstances in the world qualifies under the definition of genocide.