answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The little Albert experiment proved that psychological fears could be influence by classical conditioning. Little Albert, an infant, was first shown a white rat. At first, he was not afraid of the white rat. However, John Watson, leader of the experiment, presented the white rat repeatedly with a frightening high pitched noise (unconditioned stimulus) which scared little Albert (the unconditioned response). After five times, the infant became frightened whenever the white rat was presented (conditioned response). The white rat was what he associated with the fear of the loud noise and was now the conditioned stimulus.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6d ago

The Little Albert experiment showed that classical conditioning could be used to create a fear response in a child by pairing a neutral stimulus (a white rat) with a loud noise. This experiment demonstrated that fear responses could be learned through conditioning and generalized to other similar stimuli.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the results to the little albert experiment?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Psychology

What behaviorist conducted the Little Albert experiment?

John B. Watson conducted the Little Albert experiment in 1920.


What famous psychologist was responsible for the little albert experiment?

John B. Watson, an American psychologist, was responsible for the Little Albert experiment. It involved classical conditioning with a young boy named Albert to demonstrate how fear can be acquired through conditioning.


What happened to Little Albert in Watsons behavioral experiment?

In John Watson's behavioral experiment, known as the Little Albert experiment, a young child named Albert was conditioned to fear a white rat by pairing its presence with a loud, jarring noise. Albert eventually generalized this fear to other white objects, demonstrating how conditioning can induce fear responses in humans. The long-term effects on Albert's emotional well-being and development are unknown, as the study lacked proper ethical considerations and follow-up assessments.


What did john Watson want to prove with the little Albert experiment?

John Watson wanted to demonstrate the principles of classical conditioning by showing that fear could be conditioned in a child (Little Albert) through association with a loud noise (unconditioned stimulus). The experiment aimed to prove that emotions and behavior could be manipulated through conditioning.


How did the little Albert experiment connect to conditional learning?

The Little Albert experiment demonstrated how fear could be conditioned in a child through the association of a neutral stimulus (a white rat) with a loud, startling noise. This illustrated the concept of classical conditioning, where a new response (fear) is learned and triggered by a previously neutral stimulus (the rat).

Related questions

What behaviorist conducted the Little Albert experiment?

John B. Watson conducted the Little Albert experiment in 1920.


What famous psychologist was responsible for the little albert experiment?

John B. Watson, an American psychologist, was responsible for the Little Albert experiment. It involved classical conditioning with a young boy named Albert to demonstrate how fear can be acquired through conditioning.


Why would Watson and Rayner's experiment with little albert probably not be prerfromed today?

Watson and Rayner's experiment with little Albert had a number of ethical issues. The most important is harm to the participant. Albert was subjected to loud clanging noises and was made to develop a phobia. He also did not give informed consent as he was only a very small child. For these reasons, the experiment would not be performed today.


What happened to Little Albert in Watsons behavioral experiment?

In John Watson's behavioral experiment, known as the Little Albert experiment, a young child named Albert was conditioned to fear a white rat by pairing its presence with a loud, jarring noise. Albert eventually generalized this fear to other white objects, demonstrating how conditioning can induce fear responses in humans. The long-term effects on Albert's emotional well-being and development are unknown, as the study lacked proper ethical considerations and follow-up assessments.


What did john Watson want to prove with the little Albert experiment?

John Watson wanted to demonstrate the principles of classical conditioning by showing that fear could be conditioned in a child (Little Albert) through association with a loud noise (unconditioned stimulus). The experiment aimed to prove that emotions and behavior could be manipulated through conditioning.


What results stay the same in an experiment?

controlled results stay the same in an experiment


What are the results from an experiment called?

The results of an experiment are called your data.


Which shows that the results of an experiment are reliable?

An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex


How did the little Albert experiment connect to conditional learning?

The Little Albert experiment demonstrated how fear could be conditioned in a child through the association of a neutral stimulus (a white rat) with a loud, startling noise. This illustrated the concept of classical conditioning, where a new response (fear) is learned and triggered by a previously neutral stimulus (the rat).


When you sum up what is learned in an experiment what is it called?

The outcome of an experiment is a "conclusion", the interpretation of the results compared with the expected results and the goal of the experiment.


Why did Little Albert demonstrate fear of the white rat in Watson and Rayners experiment?

There is no definitive response that can be given because there were two variables in the experiment that could lead to different conclusions.


Do your results have to match your hypothesis in an experiment?

The results of a science experiment do not have to match the original hypothesis. Indeed, the results collected in an experiment may be completely different to those that the scientist predicted.