A cold-turkey halt to the use of fossil fuels would be disastrous:
Even if fossil fuels are slowly phased out, there are insufficient sustainable energy sources for the Earth's current population and level of industrialization, especially for motor vehicle consumption (e.g. transportation, shipping, mining, agriculture).
There would be less Carbon Dioxide In the atmosphere. (APEX)
We would have to move quickly to renewable energy if our present way of life is to survive.Global warming would gradually slow down.Air quality would improve as would people's health.
global warming would be decreased (apex)
Global warming would slow.People would improve renewable energy so that the whole world has free, non-polluting power. With renewable electricity you can use as much as you like without worry.
There would be less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
Extra carbon is getting into the atmosphere because of the actions of humans. These actions would include deforestation, pollution, and the burning of fossil fuels.
Fossil fuels are non-renewable energy sources that can be burned to get energy. The Greenhouse Effect is, in part, the result of burning fossil fuels. In this example, fossil fuels would be a causative agent that creates an effect on the environment, specifically, the Earth's atmosphere.
The biggest impact of burning fossil fuels is the modern lifestyle we live. Without the burning if fossil fuels we would have far less healthy lives, that would be much shorter and without heat, transportation, medicine or electricity or computers. Mortality rates would be massively higher.
No. Global warming is caused by man burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests. No other animal does that. If there were no humans on earth, there would be no global warming.
There are many disadvantages of burning fossil fuels. These include pollution and also burning fossil fuels has a mesurable cooling effect on the climate.There are many disadvantages of burning fossil fuels. These include pollution and also burning fossil fuels has a mesurable cooling effect on the climate.
There are 2 byproducts from burning fossil fuels. For example, the burning of octane is 2 C8H18 molecules in which you would add 25 O2 molecules, giving you combustion with a catalyst (electricity). This would result in 18 water molecules, 16 CO2 molecules plus energy. We know that water by itself is not an "ecological concern", so therefore the carbon dioxide gas that is released is the "concern".
Global Warming might decrease but people would die all over the planet unable to gain the benefits provided by the use of fossil fuels (Mainly cheap power and low cost transportation of goods) and the results such a change would have on the world's economy.