The average Roman soldier kept or wore his sword on his right hip. A centurion wore his sword on his left hip.
Ancient Roman swords were used for protecting roman empires and the roman empire is the one that used them.....
there used spears and javelin and swords and some times bow arrows
The Roman army was the most powerful one in Europe. The soldiers had swords armour and helmets with crests
Three of a Roman soldier's many duties were to obey orders, train and dig. It is said that the Roman army used their digging tools more often than they used their swords.
Not for military purposes.
Gladius
Ancient Roman swords were used for protecting roman empires and the roman empire is the one that used them.....
there used spears and javelin and swords and some times bow arrows
They spent it.
The Roman army was the most powerful one in Europe. The soldiers had swords armour and helmets with crests
Three of a Roman soldier's many duties were to obey orders, train and dig. It is said that the Roman army used their digging tools more often than they used their swords.
a regular sword ranged from about 3 to 4 feet. 56331971 said: Not really. Long swords like that were very rare, especially in Roman lands. Often, the Roman swords were actually quite short, about 1 1/2 feet, about the length of your desktop keyboard. Yup it`s that small. But surprisingly, most of the Roman shields were B.I.G. . It would cover at least 3/4 of the soldiers length. Try searching "Why were Roman swords short" in WikiAnswers if you are curious.
Soldiers were to surrender. They were permitted to keep their horses for plowing, and to keep their sidearms (pistols and swords) Other arms and artillery were to be surrendered and stacked. Officers would be paroled (agreed not to fight) and would sign paroles on behalf of their soldiers.
muskets and swords
Swords?Or Daggers
Yes, they were equipped with bronze swords. Please see the photo attached.
Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.Yes, it seems as if the Roman soldiers got their equipment free. However he was responsible for his equipment and if it were lost or damaged he had to pay for the replacement or the repair. Of course he was not restricted to "government issue" swords or knives. He could purchase his own and many did. These privately owned weapons did not have to be turned in at the man's discharge.