Any animal that is near extinction, or serves humanity (such as a cow... dog) will take a priority due to the situation at hand.
Bald eagles for instance are in scarce numbers. Thus they are protected.
The cat is overly abundant. We spay and neuter them in order to help protect the cat population from over producing and starving itself out.
The fittest (best adapted to their environment) animals are likely to survive.
Some animals are most likely to survive to adulthood because of better instincts, and predators. Again, a more specific question would lead to a more specific answer.
i guess it depends on honestly what animals you are comparing
a species that reproduces sexually
one that fed through a food web
Yes the animal would die. This is because bioaccumulation refers to an organism's absorption of a toxic chemical at a greater rate than which it can get rid of it. Usually, the animal would have no chance of survival.
It would have no chance of survival?!
That species would have it's best chance of survival as a result of a mutation that has a high adaptive value that occurs in its gametes.
climate change
florida
animals can be mutated in a kind of chemical that they might touch or drink if this happens then the animal is mutated its like chemistryAdapt to different conditions.
It doesn't, unless an animal has permanently lost its 'fingers' or 'paws' or 'talons' etc, (which me may essential in the animals' life) than the number of fingers an animal has does not concern its survival
If you have found an orphaned baby possum, it is imperative that you contact your local council or a vet for the name of a registered, accredited wildlife carer. If you do not know what you are doing, the animal stands virtually no chance of survival.
The bacteria in the colony would be too genetically similar.
The bacteria would generally be more similar
Tornado alley in America :P