The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula (Gaius), Claudius, and Nero are the Julio-Claudian Emerors.
If you mean the Julio/Claudian emperors, there were five of them, not four. The dynasty began with Augustus and continued with Tiberius, Gaius (Caligula) Claudius, and Nero.
The five Julio-Claudian emperors were 1) Augustus, 2) Tiberius, 3) Gaius (Caligula), 4) Claudius, and 5) Nero.
Tiberius
Caligula
Claudius
Neru
weak leader
The Julian emperors got to be Julian because they were born into the Julian clan.
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
The Roman emperors were absolute rulers. They power was absolute.
The "first citizens" of Rome were always the emperors.
The Julian emperors got to be Julian because they were born into the Julian clan.
In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total, Rome had 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
Ever time they were emperors, something bad happend.(ex. war)
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.
There are no emperors in Rome now-a-days, and nobody is persecuting Christians in Rome. Indeed, Rome is the centre of the Roman Catholic Church.
The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.The Julio/Claudian dynasty was the first imperial dynasty of ancient Rome. It got its name from the "gens" or family names of the emperors. Augustus, a Julian, had no heir, so he adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. Caligula, was both a Julian and Claudian, as was Claudius. Nero was a Julian but adopted as heir by Claudius. Thus the Julio/Claudian dynasty could be defined as a dynasty that was a combination of two families.
The Claudian emperors were two of the first five Roman emperors, or perhaps I should say one and a half of the first five Roman emperors. The first five emperors are referred to as the Julio-Claudian dynasty. This was because Augustus had no male heir and so adopted Tiberius, who was a Claudian. He was the "one" Claudian emperor. He was followed by Caligula, who was a Julian, and he, in turn was followed by Claudius who was a Claudian on his father's side and a Julian on his mother's side. So Claudius was half Claudian and half Julian. Nero, a Julian, rounded out the dynasty.
Currently, there are no emperors of Rome. However, there were many emperors of Rome throughout history. One of the most famous was Augustus, also known as Octavian.
why does America have presidents
The "first citizens" of Rome were always the emperors.