answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A slave who applied for his freedom on the grounds that he had once lived on free soil. But he had moved back to slave-country with his master, and local judges referred his case to the Supreme Court in 1857.

The Court decided to interpret the Constitution as the Founding Fathers would originally have meant it. A man's property was sacred. Slaves were property. Therefore slavery was legal in every state of the Union. This delighted the South, but mortally offended the Northern Abolitionists, and deepened the split between the two sections.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who was Dred Scott and why did he believe he should be free?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who said that he should be free because he lived in a free territory?

Dred Scott.


What did Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on?

Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.


What did the Dred Scott Decision did Not do?

First of all learn how to talk. Then go ask Your History teacher this question. you should have said "What did the Dred Scott decision do?" It was a slave who thought he was free and they went to court over it and the court said he was a slave and that he was not free.


Why did dred Scott agrue that he should be free?

because he onced lived in areas of the north where slavery was prohibited


What are facts about dred Scott?

His master unwisely took him into free soil, and then back into slave country. If Dred wanted his freedom, he should have applied for it on free soil, where it would have been granted automatically.


What did Dred Scott base his claim of freedom on?

Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.


What did dred Scott base his claim on freedom on?

Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.


What was the supreme court case that said free soil was unconstitutional because it denied owners their property?

I believe it was called, Dred Scott.


How was dred Scott discriminated?

because they said "slaves are property" and said that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional and they wanted to keep slaves out of western territory and any slaves found free would be back in captivity and even though Dred Scott was free for 19 years they still made him to be a slave because of the Dred Scott vs. Sanford .That is how Dred Scott was discriminated.


What describes the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?

The Missouri Compromise was illegal; therefore, Dred Scott was free.The Missouri Compromise was legal; therefore, Dred Scott wasn't free.The Missouri Compromise was illegal; therefore, Dred Scott wasn't free.The Missouri Compromise was legal; therefore, Dred Scott was free.


What was the issue in the dred Scott case?

He was a slave in a free state


Why did Dred Scott believe he was free?

Because he had once lived on free soil, where his freedom would have been granted automatically, if he had applied for it then. He didn't see why he couldn't apply for it retrospectively.