0
The Plaintiff was Mildred Jeter (Black women) and Richard Perry Loving (white male). Both were arrested on July of 1958 for violating the terms of the Racial Integrity Act. Meaning it was unlawful for a white individual to marry an African American or any other race besides their own for that matter.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What actors and actresses appeared in Loving vs. Virginia - 2007?
The cast of Loving vs. Virginia - 2007 includes: Bernie Cohen as Himself - Lawyer Mildred Loving as herself Richard Loving as himself Ottie Moore as Himself - Former Sheriff Phyl Newbeck as Herself - Historian
How did the plessy vs Ferguson case get its name?
From the plaintiff, Homer Plessy, and the defendant, John Howard Ferguson.
Can the same attorney represent the victim and the defendant on a domestic violence case were it's the state vs defendant in Tennessee?
They most certainly cannot do so. It would be a conflict of interest.
What was the outcome of the case of Gideon vs Wainwright?
Gideon vs. Wainwright is a US Supreme Court Case from 1963. The vote was unanimous. This court case decided under the fourth amendment, state courts are required to provide an attorney in criminal cases when the defendant cannot afford one.
How are case decided in court?
The 'name' of a case is called the STYLE of the case and it consists of the names of the parties involved (e.g.: Jones v. Smith, in a civil case or The state of ____ v. John BadGuy, in the case of a criminal case).
Who was the defendant in tinker vs des miones?
DEs moines
Why can't a traffic court judge offer to the defendant case dismissed vs nolle prosequi?
A traffic court judge typically cannot offer to dismiss the case outright because it is ultimately the prosecutor's decision to bring or drop charges. However, a nolle prosequi decision by the prosecutor means they are choosing not to prosecute, effectively leading to the case being dismissed without prejudice, allowing for the possibility of charges being refiled later if needed.
What are the case facts about r vs amkeyo 1917klr 14?
R v. Amkeyo 1917 KLR 14 is a case from Kenya that involves a criminal trial. The case facts typically found in the judgment would include details such as the charges brought against the defendant, the evidence presented by the prosecution, any defenses raised by the defendant, and the ultimate decision of the court. It is important to read the full judgment to understand the specific circumstances and legal principles involved in the case.
What was the defendant's position in tinker vs des moines?
They supported the school official's.
Miscegenation law struck down in the US?
Around 1958 anti-miscegenation laws were overturned through Virginia vs Loving. June 14th is a day to recognize biracial black/white marriages.
Questions about the case of West Virginia boad of education vs barnette?
Did the West Virginia flag-salute law violate the constitutional right to religious freedom of children professing the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses?
What was the paul vs Virginia case of 1868?
The Paul v. Virginia case of 1868 was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that insurance transactions were not considered interstate commerce and therefore could be regulated by individual states. This decision essentially limited the reach of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution in relation to insurance regulation.
