Courts are important because otherwise everyone would be running around killing each other because there would be no one to stop it and put them in jail, and there is always two parts to every story so how are we going to figure out which one is rigth and which one is wrong!
Another View: Courts INTERPRET the laws enacted by the legislative branch and rule upon its proper and correct application by the executive branch authorities.
Because they give reasonable responses to any conflict/problem.
as they like to do the do dar and make love to a girl called Amy
Because it interpret the laws that legislative branch had establish and settle disputes between people
i dont really know anyone else
is the district court, court of appeals and supreme court.
The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a national court system. The Articles of Confederation were eventually replaced by the U. S. Constitution.
A discussion of the pros and cons of having a dual court system instead of one unified national court system.
the United States needed a national court system when the constitution was written because the states were too independent and they were not acting as UNITED states, and instead as individual states. The leaders discovered that they had to create a strong, central government to create a strong independent country.
one important result was the forming of the national assembly/tennis court oath
national court system, state court system and tribal court system.
yes
is the district court, court of appeals and supreme court.
The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a national court system. The Articles of Confederation were eventually replaced by the U. S. Constitution.
fortnite is better then pubg
a national court system
National JudiciaryArticles: Maritime judiciary establishedConstitution: Federal judiciary established, including Supreme Court
call of duty
A discussion of the pros and cons of having a dual court system instead of one unified national court system.
Answereach State was interpreting laws for itself.
If everyone had a different national court system each state would get a different punishmentstate courts might interpret laws differently, no federal system of appeals
If everyone had a different national court system each state would get a different punishmentstate courts might interpret laws differently, no federal system of appeals