Some arguments for censorship are that some things are so disturbing or such a bad influence on people that they should be censored. Some arguments against censorship are that the people making the decisions are deciding what's right for everybody based on their own personal feelings, and also that people have a right to know about the things that affect or interest them.
People are against censorship because they believe it is the right of the people to know what is going on in the world around them. Music, television, politics, even people themselves are censored "for the greater good". People who are anti-censorship just want the public to know the truth, not the "water down" versions of "today's top stories".
the big con is that this is TOTALLY invading on our privacy. this is not a good law to pass, although it might stop a little cyber bullying
Feminists Against Censorship was created in 1989.
Campaign Against Censorship was created in 1968.
Censorship is against the Bill of Rights freedom of expression. If there is any censorship that is illegal, so your answer to the question is that there isn't any censorship.
JOHN LOCKE??
Connor Glespe
It is if it is covering up boobies.
monkeys.
try doing some reseach on arguments against it then reverse it
Personally, I am against censorship. Parents and young adults should have the choice to read these books or not. If you don't want to you don't have to. My point being this is a free country and you should have the choice or not.
There are no real, good arguments against planning. Having a plan is important in many cases.
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?
are you for or against voluntary work