Beginning in 2014, the PPACA will require individuals to purchase health care insurance. This is the first time in history that the federal government has ever forced Americans to buy anything. If this bill is upheld by the Supreme Court as being constitutional, the powers of the federal governement will be seemingly endless. The thought of being forced to purchase anything on the grounds of American citizenship is unconstitutional...
Critics often make the argument that affirmative action is unconstitutional.
There were several people involved in the PPACA. It was introduced in the House by Charles Rangle, passed by Senate, and signed by President Barack Obama.
by saying let there be justice for all and peace for all not just for one race
The question is irrelevant. The PPACA is budgeted, and is scored by both the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) and the GAO (General Accounting Office). The costs of the PPACA to the federal government are part of the general budget.Of course, with a program of the complexity and size of the PPACA, the future outcomes and costs are unknown, and can only be estimated. Which, again, the CBO and GAO both have done, and are included in all future formal budget projections.
➩ Loss of experienced legislators ➩ People can no longer vote for whomever they please ➩ Erosion of legislator's power and influence ➩ Elections already serve as a structural limitation ➩ Critics view them as unconstitutional and undemocratic
The PPACA is enforced on all legalresidents of the United States, whether they are citizens or not. None of them are exempt.Illegal residents of the US are not eligible to be covered, and cannot receive coverage under the PPACA, nor are they subject to its penalties/requirements.Thus, no one is EXEMPT - "exempt" implies that the law applies a person, but they are immune from its requirements.
Taxes on top of taxes
Power companies resented the cheaper energy which was available through the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The power companies also felt that the government's involvement in the power business was unconstitutional.
There was much criticism of the bank's policies. After criticism from the city council, the mayor withdrew the proposal.
is it unconstitutional
The PPACA is enforced on all legalresidents of the United States, whether they are citizens or not. None of them are exempt.Illegal residents of the US are not eligible to be covered, and cannot receive coverage under the PPACA, nor are they subject to its penalties/requirements.Thus, no one is EXEMPT - "exempt" implies that the law applies a person, but they are immune from its requirements.
no it can not be unconstitutional