answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Hindu had a policy of only carrying advertisements in the first page.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did The Hindu not carry the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi on the first page?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What does ganesh a Hindu god carry?

Hindu God Lord Ganesha have head of an elephant. He rides on a mouse and carry Shankha.


What makes Mahatma Gandhi A Great example among future leaders?

People will look up to Gandhi in many ways. There shouldn't be any negative thoughts about Gandhi. He wanted peace and he succeeded in it by using his peaceful methods. Gandhi knew things would go the wrong way, but he also knew as long as he succeeded in one place with these methods, it would carry on and keep succeeding in other places too. Later, other citizens will use Gandhi's non violent methods, and will do great, just like him.


What is the specific act of civil disobedience that gandhi is threatening to carry out?

making salt


What made Gandhi a good leader?

He was a good leader because he wasn't selfish and thought of others before him. He was very wise and didn't believe in violence; he thought violence was irrational. He made a point to starve himself to demonstrate what was going on in the Congo Basin at the time. He moved and inspired people like Martin Luther King Jr. and James Lawson.


Was there cars in Hindu?

A Hindu is a person, not a place. If you mean whether there were vehicles to carry people in olden days in India, YES. There is mention even about Aeroplanes, Aerofloats, etc,.


Is it considered treason to advocate the assassination of the president of your country?

Yes, and it is against the law. If you do something to carry it out there is a guarantee of a FBI visit.


What was the specific act of civil disobedience that Gandhi is threatening to carry out?

Gandhi threatened to carry out the Salt March, also known as the Salt Satyagraha, in protest of the British salt monopoly in India in 1930. This act of civil disobedience involved marching to the Arabian Sea to collect salt from the ocean, in defiance of British laws.


What would Macbeth be willing to risk if he could get away with the this assassination?

Macbeth would be willing to risk his honor, reputation, and relationships to carry out the assassination if he could get away with it. His ambition and desire for power drive him to take extreme actions, even at the cost of his integrity and moral values.


How do you spell assassanaited?

The correct spelling is assassinated.Breaking a word down into smaller chunks can make it easier to remember how to spell: Assa-ssin-at-ed.


How do you say Savannah in Hindu?

The name "Savannah" does not have a direct translation in Hindu or any other Indian languages. However, you may find variations of the name or similar-sounding names in Indian languages that carry a similar meaning or appeal.


Did Mohandas Gandhi make a difference?

yes he did a very big change. for example- he stopped the way people were treating indians for being colored and have to carry passports everywhere they go.


Who was Gandhi killed by and why?

A social reformer and freedom fighter by the name of Mahatma Nathuram Godse , shot Mohandas Gandhi 3 times with a Beretta M semi-automatic revolver . While more than 3 million people attended Mohandas Gandhi's funeral , no one paid attention to the plight of Godse who was hanged after a pseudo , Nazi Germany, like trial done under specific instructions from Mr Nehru ( who was the then PM of India. ) to hang Godse .The assassin, Nathuram Godse, was a social reformer , and a freedom fighter, erroneously perceived as a Hindu nationalist by the media. He killed Gandhi because , Gandhi in his zeal to look "fair, secular and equal" to the world actually actually cowed down under Islamic Fundamentalist pressure and compromised the interests of 30 million Hindus , that eventually led to their massive genocide. In today's context the parallel to this would be something like this. Islamic Fundamentalists wowing to destroy the West and Israel, carry out 9/11. As a response to that The President instead of ordering airstrikes in Pakistan / Afghanistan actually actually says "sorry" to the terrorists and announces a special state called "Islamabad" in USA specially for Moslems where Sharia Law would be allowed. He appeals to the local Christian population that initially occupied that land to evacuate the place to make "place for our moslem brothers". Some people can't stand it and shoot him down. This is just an imaginary situation. No disrespect for The President. We know out President GWB was anything but that but that would be a perfect comparison to help understand Godse's position.Refer to the the following lines from Godse's own testimony ( available uncensored in Google Docs) that help expound the situation that led Godse to kill Gandhi :-" From August 1946 onwards, the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with little retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi's infatuation for them. .............One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed some conditions on the Muslims in Pakistan, here would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any conditions on the Muslims.He was fully aware from past experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi. Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he has failed in his paternal duty in as much he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power, his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled against Jinnah's iron will and proved to be powerless."At the time of Gandhi's death, an Islamic Fundamentalist driven demand to investigate the role of Hindu Organizations in the death of Mr Gandhi was readily conceded by the then ruling party Indian National Congress ( which BTW across its 70+ year ruling span also became notorious for harboring the world largest Swiss Bank accounts and the dubious distinction of the most Corrupt Political Party in the globe ). So called "Hindu Fundamentalist" leaders were thrown in jail, tortured and made to falsely confess relations with Godse . A few months later after all investigations proved these claims baseless , they had to be released.