Alexander the great is depicted as a great military leader because in 13 years he conquered most of the known world, generally in the face of insuperable odds. Many of his tactics are taught in military schools today.
He was so strong as a military leader because his dad made him a fearless leader.
Alexander the Great was well prepared to be a great leader because of his teachers. His father insisted that he study to be a great warfare strategist and Aristotle taught him wisdom and humanism.
Alexander was so Successful at spreading his empire because he was Very clever, intelligent, brave and was a fierce warrior. Also he had good strategies.
The spoils from the successful military campaigns and the tributes owed by the states increased Egypt's wealth and prosperity.
Alexander the Great was able to build such a large and expansive empire because of his warfare strategy. Alexander the Great was able to defeat any enemy that crossed his path, which allowed him to conquer all of the countries he entered and add them to his empire.
After the assassination of his father Philip, the Greek cities began to revolt. Thebe was the leader, so Alexander had to put it down, destroying the city and selling its people into slavery as an example to the other cities.
He was charismatic and successful as a military leader.
The mongols was so military successful because strategists and tacticians. This were tough people.
There are so many countries in Asia, each with their own military it is impossible to choose a "main military leader".There are so many countries in Asia, each with their own military it is impossible to choose a "main military leader".
Alexander was so Successful at spreading his empire because he was Very clever, intelligent, brave and was a fierce warrior. Also he had good strategies.
Alexander the Great was well prepared to be a great leader because of his teachers. His father insisted that he study to be a great warfare strategist and Aristotle taught him wisdom and humanism.
Your question calls for an opinion, so I can only give mine. In my thinking Julius Caesar was much more successful than Alexander the Great. I base this on what the two leaders left to posterity. Caesar, for starters, had the common sense to make a will and designate an heir so his reforms and family name would continue. Alexander foolishly did no such thing and there was turmoil and division after his death and all his victories were for nothing, as there was no large Macedonian empire after he died. True, there was civil war after Caesar's death, but it was settled and Rome grew and prospered. Caesar also gave us numerous innovations and left us literature while Alexander left the world nothing except the historical fact that he was a great military leader.
Alexander the great was well prepared to be a great leader because of his teachers. His father insisted that he study to be a great warfare strategist and Aristotle taught him wisdom and Humanism.
His reasons were possibly: 1. He wanted to expand his empire. 2. He loved being a military leader. or 3. He wanted to conquer Persia so he had no more trouble from them. Your welcome! Wiki Contributor
yes he was and so was john Adams and other presidants
Alexander was so Successful at spreading his empire because he was Very clever, intelligent, brave and was a fierce warrior. Also he had good strategies.
The Assyrians were considered a 'warrior people' by their contemporaries and they were led by a succession of very successful and astute military leaders as kings.
We were succesful because we had a better and larger army.