Both are correct. In words where the stress is not on the first syllable, an initial h may be silent before the articles anand the.
Both "a historian" and "an historian" are correct, as people may pronounce the 'h' in historian either silently or with a slight aspirated sound. In British English, it is more common to use "an historian" due to the way the 'h' is pronounced.
You can say "following" or "subsequent to" instead of "after".
Yes, I can say "mines" instead of "my" if you prefer.
Some words that rhyme with historian are, "accordion," "sorcerer" and "Adorian."
It is more common to say "not seated" or "not in their seat" instead of "not in seat."
You can say "you're welcome," "no problem," or "it's all good."
Mu'arrikh
Historiador, a
it is the walled city.
black
it is a historian.
yes
This requires a subjective answer, as many historians have pointed out. With that said, one main job of a historian is to search for facts about the topic or area that is being studied. The research for facts should be unbiased. If a bias is intended, then the historian needs to inform the reader of this. For example, a historian wants to write about Marxist interpretations of World War II. In such a publication the historian must say whether he/she is a Marxist or not.
This requires a subjective answer, as many historians have pointed out. With that said, one main job of a historian is to search for facts about the topic or area that is being studied. The research for facts should be unbiased. If a bias is intended, then the historian needs to inform the reader of this. For example, a historian wants to write about Marxist interpretations of World War II. In such a publication the historian must say whether he/she is a Marxist or not.
The historian was confused by the evidence presented to him. They were unable to get a definitive answer from the historian.
you cannot say that and I do not know what you say instead
The plural of historian is historians.
Polybius was a Greek historian.