because of the passing of energy from one animal to the other. Producers make 1000 energy from the sun. Then as the next animal eats it, like the grasshopper, the grasshopper gets only 100 energy from the plant it ate, and so one. There is less predators because the more the energy lost, the more that the for say, frogs have to eat more grasshoppers to get the same amount of energy that the grasshopper got from the grass. So larger predators have to try hard to eat more, so there is less because not many animals can eat enough of the other animals because of the loss of energy.
There are always fewer predators than prey because there have to be enough prey to reproduce and still keep the predators alive. If there were more predators than prey, the prey population would quickly be reduced to near zero and the predators would starve.
It all has to do with the level of energy in each level. The most is in the lowest level (producers). They need energy to grow and reproduce so only about 1% can be used by the next level (herbivores), the next level only gets 1% of 1% (carnivores and omnivores). That is about as far as the levels go. Unless the area can support a tremendous amount of plants. That would be found in the tropical and temperate rainforests. That area can support 4 levels. There also fewer in each level because the energy is decreased.
Lots of grass a couple of trees, some deer and many rabbits and a couple of hawks can be found in the drier plains.
if there are too many carnivores than there will be no herbivores and no producers. And eventually they will die
.
Snakes are predators and frogs are, for the most part, prey.
predators eat their prey
Rabbits are prey.
The connection between prey and predator is that predators are organisms that eat other organisms, and prey are the organisms that are eaten. For example, lion's are predators and zebra are an example of their prey. This can also refer to plants: rabbits are the predators and lettuce is the prey. Without prey, the predators would have nothing to eat. Without predators, the preyy population would increase to the point of overpopulation.
Decline of prey, decline of space, foreign predators that hunt both predators and prey
Snakes are predators and frogs are, for the most part, prey.
In a stable ecosystem (like a rain forest), there will usually be fewer predators/meat eaters than prey/plant eaters, because the higher up you are on the food chain, the fewer of you there will be; If there were fewer prey animals than predators, they would all be eaten quickly, and the predators would starve and the ecosystem would break down. But if there are more prey animals than predators, the prey animals will live long enough to reproduce and keep the population stable, the predators will still have food and the ecosystem will stabilize.
Fewer Predators
Because - eventually, the gradual reduction in the number of prey animals would result in fewer predators. Less predators gives the prey animals time to recover their numbers. Therefore there will always be at least some prey for predators to feed on.
There is no short term effect, the cycle will just go in these four stages. more predators= fewer preys too little food= predators starve few predators= more prey survive food plentiful= more predators survive
They are both predators and prey.
They are both predators and prey.
Yes. They're a prey animal, which makes them more than inclined to have predators.
Other than occasionally eating small insects, monkeys are not predators and have no prey.
Prey bugs and predators leapords
Prey animals are eaten by predators. (Preydators)
4 predators and 4 prey that the predators have killed for their dinner!4 predators and 4 prey that the predators have killed for their dinner!4 predators and 4 prey that the predators have killed for their dinner!4 predators and 4 prey that the predators have killed for their dinner!