answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

General George B. McClellan served in the US Civil War as a major general and also a general in chief. McClellan was a brilliant organizer and a highly intelligent military officer. He also was an excellent in mapping out Union strategies that impacted both Eastern and Western theaters of the war. Where he was deficient was in battle field tactics. He was over cautious, over estimated the enemy's strength, and ignored the fact that President Lincoln was his commander in chief.

He did salvage some of his tactical problems by his performance at the Battle of Antietam, but not enough to keep his job.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Losing his nerve at any reports of enemy forces that were numerically superior. It is known that these reports were incredibly exaggerated. There was also a lost opportunity when a Confederate General marched a small unit round and round a mountain, to look like a huge army, and McClellan was fooled again.

IMPROVEMENT

McClellan was an excellent engineer and, like all engineers he aimed to create perfect plans of campaigning in which factors UNCERTAINTY and CHANCE

were but only a little taken into consideration. Also the factor HAZARD was mainly underestimated. He thought that his plans were so perfect to exclude any possibility of hazard, but every time the reality of facts and unexpected

events prevent him from starting the planned action, since, in those cases he would have been compelled to face some risks and... he didn't move.

To better sum up the matter I do think it's worth reading what General Meade

wrote to his wife on Jan. 8,1863 (approximate text):

"I am tired of doing the war without risks. We have to take some risks if we are going to fight and a war can't be carried on without fighting. This was McClellan's fault. He always was waiting that everything was all right as planned, before attacking. But before he was been able to sort out the things as planned, the enemy swooped upon him messing up all his plans"

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

General McClellan was considered to be an ineffective leader because he was excellent in strategy but poor in tactics. This led him to avoid armed conflict unless he was forced into it by actions of the Confederate armies.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Refusing to move until everything was ready - Generals can't always demand this luxury (although Montgomery did).

Believing the huge over-estimates of enemy strength given to him by Allan Pinkerton.

Upsetting Lincoln's cabinet because he was a Democrat.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

He was excessively cautious, and unwilling to make a move until everything was ready - a luxury that is not on the menu in most campaigns, and a weakness that was easily exploited by his opponent, the fast-moving and nimble Robert E. Lee.

This weakness was compounded by his faith in the military intelligence supplied by Pinkerton, the successful peacetime detective, who turned out to be way out of his depth in wartime operations. McClellan often heard reports of enemy numbers two or three times the real figure.

He was also mistrusted in Washington as a possible 'Copperhead' (anti-war Democrat), and he did indeed run against Lincoln in the 1864 election.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

President Lincoln had no doubts about the qualifications of George McClellan. He had graduated near the top of his class at West Point. Lincoln believed after interviewing him, that he was the right man to place in charge of the Army of the Potomac.

His soon to be critics, including Lincoln, believed that McClellan constantly over estimated the size of Confederate forces he planned to face.

Lincoln also felt that McClellan also delayed action far too long for Lincoln's plan to end the war with some quick swift battles.

Later, after he was relieved and replaced ( several Union generals would lead the Army of the Potomac, all fired or resigned except for Grant).

Some Northerners believed that as a Democrat, McClellan, was really not in favor of the war. This, they point out as McClellan ran on a "peace" platform as the Democrat candidate for President in 1864.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

One of the best known Union generals was General in Chief George B. McClellan. He served for only 18 months during the war, however, he, and generals US Grant and William Sheridan, are probably the most known of all the Union generals. General McClellan was a military genius, however, this was mitigated by his reluctance to fight any battle where his forces did not have a clear advantage in numbers. Even when he did have the troops required, he believed false reports that the Confederates had many more troops then they really did. He wanted to protect the lives of his soldiers at all costs. Therefore, he was reluctant to engage in battle unless he was forced to, such as at Antietam in Maryland. There in Union territory, he had no choice but to fight. And, he did have the troop advantage in that bloody battle as well.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

his excessive cation and reluctance to use his troops in battle.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was the union general mcclellan not effective as a military commander?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Military History

Why is George McClellan important in the civil war?

McClellan was a Union commander and he repelled general Lee's first Northern invasion.


Did general grant replaced McClellan as head of the union army?

No. McClellan was Commander of the Department of the Ohio, Commander of the Department of the East before being promoted to General in Chief and Commander of the Army of the Potomac. He was replaced as Commander of the Department of the Ohio by Ormsby M. Mitchel. He was replaced as Commander of the East and General in Cheif by Henry Halleck and replaced as Commander of the Army of the Potomac by Ambrose E. Burnside.


Why was union General McClellan not effective as a military commander?

Refusing to move until everything was ready - Generals can't always demand this luxury (although Montgomery did). Believing the huge over-estimates of enemy strength given to him by Allan Pinkerton. Upsetting Lincoln's cabinet because he was a Democrat.


Who was the leader of the union in the Battle of Antietam?

The commander of the Unions Army of the Potomac at Antietam was Major General George B. McClellan.


Why was the union general mcclellan not effective as military commander?

General McClellan was not effective as a military commander for several reasons. Firstly, he was known for his overly cautious approach, frequently overestimating enemy troop strength and being overly concerned about casualties. This led to unnecessary delays and missed opportunities. Additionally, he struggled with making decisive decisions and failed to fully utilize the resources and manpower at his disposal. Lastly, his strained relationship with President Lincoln and inability to effectively coordinate with other Union generals further hindered his effectiveness.

Related questions

Why was Union General George G Meade loyal to his former commander General George B McClellan?

General Meade remained loyal to his former commander, George B. McClellan, even after Meade was appointed the leader of the Army of the Potomac. He, like McClellan outwardly criticized the political interference the military had to deal with concerning military issues.


Why was union general mc clellan not effective as a military commander?

His cautiousness caused, ultimately, the Civil War to be prolonged


Why is George McClellan important in the civil war?

McClellan was a Union commander and he repelled general Lee's first Northern invasion.


Did general grant replaced McClellan as head of the union army?

No. McClellan was Commander of the Department of the Ohio, Commander of the Department of the East before being promoted to General in Chief and Commander of the Army of the Potomac. He was replaced as Commander of the Department of the Ohio by Ormsby M. Mitchel. He was replaced as Commander of the East and General in Cheif by Henry Halleck and replaced as Commander of the Army of the Potomac by Ambrose E. Burnside.


Why was union General McClellan not effective as a military commander?

Refusing to move until everything was ready - Generals can't always demand this luxury (although Montgomery did). Believing the huge over-estimates of enemy strength given to him by Allan Pinkerton. Upsetting Lincoln's cabinet because he was a Democrat.


Who was the leader of the union in the Battle of Antietam?

The commander of the Unions Army of the Potomac at Antietam was Major General George B. McClellan.


Who was First General over Army of the Potomac?

General George B. McClellan was the first commander of the Federal Army of the Potomac.


When was general Burnside put in overall command of Union forces?

After the battle of Antietam, Lincoln decided to replace General McClellan as the top military commander with general Ambrose E. Burnside. On November 3rd of 1862, Lincoln made this important change in the Union's military forces.


Who was known to be the most effective military commander in the confederate army?

Although some military experts of today and of the past might disagree, many people believe the best and most effective Confederate military commander for the Confederacy was General Robert E. Lee. He was the commander of the Confederate force known as the Army of Northern Virginia. Certainly other commanders come to mind in a possible debate on the subject. Some might consider Lee's top general, Stonewall Jackson as the most effective commander for the South. Few can doubt his excellent skills in defeating Federal forces larger than his own forces.


Why was the union general mcclellan not effective as military commander?

General McClellan was not effective as a military commander for several reasons. Firstly, he was known for his overly cautious approach, frequently overestimating enemy troop strength and being overly concerned about casualties. This led to unnecessary delays and missed opportunities. Additionally, he struggled with making decisive decisions and failed to fully utilize the resources and manpower at his disposal. Lastly, his strained relationship with President Lincoln and inability to effectively coordinate with other Union generals further hindered his effectiveness.


What was the main source of military intelligence for Union General George B McClellan as he pursued Robert E Lee's march to Maryland in 1862?

When Confederate General Robert E. Lee decided to raid the Northern frontier by crossing the Potomac River, he found out that President Lincoln had replaced John Pope with George B. McClellan, as the commander of the the Army of the Potomac. General McClellan relied on two sources of intelligence to track General Lee's progress north. Some came from civilian observers, however, professional information came from the commander of his cavalry brigade, Alfred Pleasonton.


What private organization did Union General George B McClellan hire to help gather military intelligence?

The private organization that Union General George McClellan hired to help gather military intelligence was the Union Espionage Organization.