no , if there are less people it means they dont have to produce for them. And less people will produce food
smile*
wiink*
If global warming is really setting in, then fewer and fewer people will be cool.
No, the world would be slower and it would be much more expensive to get anywhere.
There are fewer than 3 people with the name Charnotte.
The production function is very important to the people in the business world. This is because all forms of business rely on production in one way or another.
because less people parc
It is my theory that the world needs to have fewer people living in it so that the environment will not be damaged.
In humans no members of the community are natural enemy's and if there were not people trying to make people seem different usually using ignorance and religion as a driver the world would have fewer people enjoying a far better life then is the situation at present.
There are an estimated 6,700 recognized languages in the world. Most of them are spoken by fewer than 1,000 people.
Not that much different. But probably with poorer breath, fewer teeth and more people using bridges and dentures. Maybe even restaurants and ready-to-eat meals aimed particularly at people with few/no teeth.
World food production has doubled in the last 40 years because more land cultivation. People have been sensitized on the importance of food production all over the world.
That would affect the food cycle, less production.
The Appendix is a place an extra supply of them is stored. (Without an appendix, you would eventually get a new supply from other people you meet, but this probably took longer when there were fewer humans in the world.)