One Contributors Opinion
no!But why you want get a divorce?
It is quite possible she will get the majority of your income for life because you are a man and you should be punished in the eyes of the law. the law heavily favors women and statics proove they get anything they want. Be prepared for unmerciful treatment from the judge and the 2 lawyers will laugh all the way to the bank about how you will never have a dime and the service they perform to society.
The power to "grant" a divorce does not lie with you it lies with the family courts. You cannot force your spouse to stay married to you. The court will establish child support (and alimony, if any) based on the needs of the parties and the ability to pay.
The courts determine how financial assets are split between husband and wife. For the most part, each part gets half.
Texas
you put register and make a knew one i guess .
In a divorce case, a motion to retain refers to a request made by one party to the court to keep certain assets or property under their possession or control until the final resolution of the case. It is typically filed to prevent the other party from selling, transferring, or disposing of assets during the divorce proceedings. The purpose of this motion is to ensure that both parties have an equitable distribution of assets when the divorce is finalized.
You don't have to bother speculating. Federal courts do not, and never will, decide divorce actions.
No. Divorce is a matter for the state courts.
Maybe.We can't give you a definite answer because it really depends on far too many details, some of which are subjective. Divorce courts try to reach an "equitable" division of assets, but what's considered "equitable" depends to some extent on how good the lawyer for each side is at arguing that his client should receive the bulk of the assets.
It depends on the circumstances but generally speaking, alimony cannot be added after the divorce is finalized, even where spousal support was not discussed at all in the settlement. This is because the divorce decree is considered final, not only as to the issues actually addressed, but for all issues that could have been addressed in court. Courts generally lose the power to award alimony once they have determined that they will not award any.
Forgiveness could only be granted by the person who has been deprived of alimony. If someone has been deprived of their due alimony payments, it is up to them to decide whether to pursue through the courts, bring a civil action, or not, the choice is yours.
There is no brighline answer to this question but usually short marriages to not qualify a spouse for alimony because there is an assumption that there was not enough time to create the need for alimony payments. More specifically, the court assumes that you have kept the same ability to support yourself that you had before marriage. And each spouse is expected to be substantially independent and self-supporting within a short period of time. However, there are circumstances in which a shorter marriage would allow for alimony. For example, a situation in which one party was not working at all and does not have the skills to make an income or some other showing of hardship.
You can lose spousal support if your boyfriend moves in with you. It is up to the courts to determine this.