The New Deal was a great success in that it improved the federal government's role in economic affairs. It was not at all radical, but rather made programs designed for relief, recovery, and reform. The New Deal made many plans to fix the banking system, provide jobs (Civilian Conservation Corps), and provided for welfare (Social Security). The New Deal didn't completely solve the problems that America faced after the depression, however, it did solve a few of the problems, for example unemployment was rapidly reduced during the 1930's, for around 3 million young men under the age of 25, the CCC provided their first experience of work. Some people from the government might not have agreed that the New deal was a success because they may have thought President Roosevelt was trying to do too much and not everything he said he would do succeeded. However, many of the items that were worst off, for example unemployment was targeted and many people were able to stay in jobs. Although, many of the jobs that were given were classed as ‘forced labour’. The aim of reform was to try and prevent the Wall Street Crash form ever happening again. Reform was to do with Roosevelt’s Second New Deal. By 1936 over 3.5 million people were employed in various divisions of the WPA like the CCC, the NYA and the PWA. These Alphabet agencies can be used to show that the New Deal was a success as they helped millions of unemployed people find work and also earn money to buy food. The main aims of relief were to help the homeless as well as the unemployed people in America. Some alphabet agencies that were to do with relief were the CWA, the FERA, the HOLC and the CCC. The CWA provided work for the unemployed like the WPA; the CWA found the unemployed work and paid wages for doing it. People working for the CWA built schools, roads and airports this was also to do with recovery. I think that this was a successful agency because it found homeless and unemployed people work, then paid them, which would help the homeless and unemployed people to gain an income so they could buy houses and food. The Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA) gave money to help unemployed and homeless people. The Government gave each state one dollar for every three the state spent on the relief of poverty. This encouraged sates to help the homeless and unemployed people living in the state. I also think that this was a successful part of the New Deal as it encouraged states to help the homeless and unemployed people, this help would then cause the number of homeless and unemployed in each state to decrease, as the local governments would try to help the homeless and unemployed just to get money from the government. The Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) used Federal money to pay of mortgages so that home owners did not lose their homes. This is also another agency that I think was a successful part of the New Deal because it stopped even more people from becoming homeless, because the government was willing to pay off the loans that people had to pay on their homes, therefore this could decrease the number of homeless and unemployed people in America In conclusion I think that the New Deal was neither a complete success nor a complete failure because it did help many Americans regain jobs and wages, but it also failed in some parts because some of the alphabet agencies that President Roosevelt created to combat the problem of the depression were declared unconstitutional which means they were ‘Not in keeping with the basic principles or laws set forth in the constitution of a state or country, especially the Constitution of the United States.’
Yes,I do agree on the statement because politics is all about the way of developing the country which the politicians do not do.
I agree with the federalists because they are supporting the government. On the other hand, why agree with people who are going against government matters? The federalists are sticking up for what is right and for what we need. That's a great way to repay them for standing by our side
I would not agree with this statement. There are many powers and actions that, while not expressly prohibited, are also not permitted or acceptable. For instance, while a person is not expressly prohibited from driving while taking a prescription for opiate pain medications, that person is not permitted to drive freely unless they are sober.
I am sorry but we can't answer because we don't know the speech so can't give an answer.
Hell Is a place where sin is punished justly and thoroughly -Apex
do you agree. "accounting is vital to the success of a business" explain
The concept of competitve advantage is as important for non- profit orgnizations as it is for profit orgnizatios Do you agree with this statement or not? Explain with examples to justify your answer.
"The concept of competitive advantage is as important for non-profit organizations as it is for profit organizations". Do you agree with this statement or not? Explain with examples to justify your answer. "The concept of competitive advantage is as important for non-profit organizations as it is for profit organizations". Do you agree with this statement or not? Explain with examples to justify your answer.
The statement "I agree with you" is correct. "Am" is not needed in this context because "agree" already indicates the present tense.
I do agree with the statement that anyone can cook.
women in war are agree or disagree briefly explain why agree or disagree?
agree
Yes I do.To those who believe, no explanation is necessary.To those who do not believe, no explanation is possible.
Yes, I agree.
Do you agree with the statement, "An object with a zero velocity can have an acceleration greater than zero."? Explain your answer.
it was in very bad state and i agree with that statement
I agree because many people in history such as Martin L. King Jr. were an inspriation to not only other children but some adults.