yes, it would because of the disperse in weight on the object will allow less force to be applied.
Yes, increasing the length of the effort arm would make it easier to move the object. The longer the effort arm, the more leverage you have to overcome resistance. By increasing the length of the effort arm, you can apply less force to move the object.
no
A floating object has a density less than what it is floating in. If an object has more density than the medium it is placed in, the medium will be unable to hold the object. The object will, therefore, sink.
An object that lets no light pass through is called opaque. This means that light is unable to penetrate or pass through the object, resulting in the absence of transparency.
Authorities in Australia have been unable to eradicate the cane toad. It remains a pest with an ever-increasing range.
A rock is an example of a solid. Look at the link for a picture of a rock.
It would have been far simpler and quicker to use your calculator but since you are unable or unwilling to make that effort, the answer is 2.1
Unable to say, as this will depend on the plastic resin, the filler material, if a blowing agent was used to foam the plastic, and the size/shape of the object.
No, we would be unable to perceive the object. Have you ever seen a computer animation of a four dimensional object? It would be impossible to exist as a tangible object.
No. In fact efforts are likely to increase. That is provided you continue to make no effort to pay, or are unable to bring the account current.
Since I am unable to see what object that you are trying to identify, I am unable to assist you. Please feel free to resubmit your question with more information so we can better assist you.
A force that is perpendicular to the direction of motion of the object will never speed it up. This is because the force is unable to transfer any of its energy in the direction of motion.