No...small populations have less genetic diversity. Explained by random genetic drift from neutral theory, the smaller the population, the faster it will fix on a certain allele, that is, a less genetic diversity.
Small populations increase the likelihood of inbreeding. Inbreeding negatively affects the genetics of something by causing recessive genes (physical attributes that are no-longer or are rarely present in offspring) to become more and more dominant. Also, because the same genes are being used in a population, there is no genetic advancement cause by the presence of new or different genetics.
Populations which are smaller experience more genetic drift. This is because they probability of sudden frequency changes in the genes would be greater in small populations.
Eg consider a small population of red beetles where a variation exists i.e a very few beetles which are blue.
Now for namesake consider that a large elephant comes by and stamps the beetles which incidently are all red(which was first in majority). Thus an unexpected accident caused a major change in frequency of genes.
had this been in a very large population then there is a probability that a few red beetles may have survived etc.
No, it is more likely to occur in smaller populations.
They have a greater frequency of harmful genes.
True, as is opposite.
Small populations.
trueAllele frequencies always drift to some degree. The rate of drift may be slower in large populations, but it is never zero.
Genetic Drift
Genetic drift is the term used for random evolutionary developments that have equal "survival-value" with respect to natural selection. Natural selection defines broad parameters for what kind of traits organisms existing in a certain environment should ideally have, but within these parameters there is a lot of room for random drift.
false... its likely to occur in small population
Small populations.
Genetic drift has less effect on large populations.
If there is a large amount of genetic drift :)
Genetic drift occurs in all finite populations. However the effects of drift are more pronounced in smaller populations than in large ones. Meanwhile, even though they are more present in smaller populations, the drifting is more likely to occur in larger populations because of the larger number of different genetic combinations present. Throughout evolution of populations, genetic drifting effects all types of population sizes, though it is more likely in larger populations but more present in smaller populations.
While genetic drift is random to some extent; it does follow certain statistical rules. The time it takes for an allele to become fixed is shorter in a small population than in a large one.
Mutation rates are small but constant. With a typical mutation rate of 1 x 10-6, it is expected that 1 out of a million individuals in a population will carry the mutation. If the population size is small (10,000 or fewer individuals), the probability that the mutation will be present is small (~1% with 104 individuals). If population sizes are large (107 or more individuals), the probability that the mutation will be present is large (~10 mutants expected if 107 individuals are in the population). Mutations can be lost from populations through genetic drift, and large populations experience less genetic drift than small populations. Thus mutations are more likely to exist and persist in large populations than in small populations.
trueAllele frequencies always drift to some degree. The rate of drift may be slower in large populations, but it is never zero.
A large population..
Genetic Drift
All events that result in changes in allele frequencies in populations contribute to evolution. Genetic drift likewise. Genetic drift is no different from all other reproductive variation, save that the term refers to changes that are more or less neutral.
Genetic drift is the spread of specific random variations throughout the gene pool in the absence of specific selection pressures. There's always random variation in the population, but there aren't always changes in the environment for the population to adapt to. So natural selection, in stead of moving the population towards adaptation, might select from that random variation to move 'sideways', as it were, to a state that's equally well-adapted to the environment as what came before, but different. As random variation may produce many variants that are, more or less, equally well-adapted to their environment, the direction of evolution that results is more or less random. Because variations may spread throughout small populations faster than throughout large populations, and because a large gene pool has a stabilizing effect on the spread of variations, small populations drift faster than large populations.
Genetic drift is the spread of specific random variations throughout the gene pool in the absence of specific selection pressures. There's always random variation in the population, but there aren't always changes in the environment for the population to adapt to. So natural selection, in stead of moving the population towards adaptation, might select from that random variation to move 'sideways', as it were, to a state that's equally well-adapted to the environment as what came before, but different. As random variation may produce many variants that are, more or less, equally well-adapted to their environment, the direction of evolution that results is more or less random. Because variations may spread throughout small populations faster than throughout large populations, and because a large gene pool has a stabilizing effect on the spread of variations, small populations drift faster than large populations.