1m.
The speed is equal to the product of the frequency and the wavelength. First convert the wavelength to meters, so as to have compatible units.The speed of an electromagnetic wave in a vacuum is ALWAYS the same - around 300 million meters/second. If you get any result, something is wrong - unless the wave travels through some other medium, in which case its speed can be less than the speed of light in a vacuum.
1501
Yes it does. It is part of the hydro logical cycle.
v=fλ (velocity (m/s)=frequency (s^-1) * wavelength (m)When dealing with light v=hf is also useful (same derivation as for above), where h is the Planck constant.
a) testiable b) falisable c)both of the above d) none of the above the answer is , B ; falsiable . (: ENJOYYY ! <3
Frequency is the number of waves per second, i.e. 20Hz is 20 waves per second. Wavelength is obviously the length of each wave i.e 20m So if there are 20 waves per second, the distance it travels is the length of the wave multiplied by the number of waves in one second. The distance travelled in one second by the wave above is therefore 20 * 20m wich is 400m. The distance travelled in 1 second is 400m. Therefore every second, the wave travels 400m and thus the speed is 400meters per second (400m/s).
The general distinction between a mountain and a hill is based on their height and steepness. Mountains are typically taller, have more significant elevation changes compared to their surroundings, and often have rugged terrain. Hills are smaller landforms that are not as tall or steep as mountains.
Light travels 3/10 of a meter in 1ns or light travels 1 foot in 1ns. The answer above is clearly wrong, light travels so fast that you cannot time it with a stopwatch etc. Light travels at 300,000 kilometres a second. One millisecond is one thoudandth of a second. One metre is one thuosandthy of a kilometre. Thus in one thousandth of a second, light travels 300,000 metres. Please, somebody, check my logic! Your logic is right but your numbers are not. 1 ns means one nanosecond , a billionth of a second ,not a millisecond. I do wish people would write out words in full, and not rely on someone interpteting an abbreviation correctly. E.G. 'm' as a unit of length, which I have seen refering to 'miles' or 'metres'! It's so easy in a complex question, e.g. about the speed of light, to mistake one unit for another if just the initial is used. Thanks for the correction above.
Given the wavelength of the photons from above, 3000 nm you just calculate how many joules each photon has and divide that into 100 joules per second.
The speed is equal to the product of the frequency and the wavelength. First convert the wavelength to meters, so as to have compatible units.The speed of an electromagnetic wave in a vacuum is ALWAYS the same - around 300 million meters/second. If you get any result, something is wrong - unless the wave travels through some other medium, in which case its speed can be less than the speed of light in a vacuum.
v = fλ V/f = λ (wavelength) V = 340ms-1 340/f = λ In short you need to know the frequency of the particular sound wave to work out it's wavelength. once you know that you plug it into the above equation and you will get the wavelength of the wave.
light travels one light year in one years timeokay so whoever wrote this above is a retard, and light travels 6 trillion miles in one year, there is 525,600 minutes in a year, times that by 60, then do your 1.86X10 to the fifth and there you go
Above is accented on the second syllable.
Kinetic energy = 1/2 (mass) (speed)2 = 1/2 (0.2) (200)2 = 4,000 joules
Second syllable.
Above is a second accent syllable.
1501