A rock
No, "never lived" refers to something that has not experienced life, while "non-living" means something that does not possess life. "Never lived" implies a lack of existence, while "non-living" indicates the absence of life in an existing entity.
A living thing has biological processes such as metabolism, growth, and reproduction, while something that has never lived, such as a rock, does not exhibit these processes. Living things also respond to stimuli and have the ability to adapt to their environment, characteristics that non-living things lack.
the answer is dead why would it be living.....
no... dead means 'to be completely and utterly dead', wheras non living means your not alive, but not not necessarily dead...and you might think that a non-living thing was once made up of living things(such as a leopard jacket) but the non-living thig and its materials were put through a process to become something completely new and different.so it isnt necessarily aline nor is it dead.
Non living
Non-Living Thing.
Sand is usually made of small particles of rock which were never alive or part of a living thing, although it is also possible to make sand out of sea shells, which are part of a living thing although they are not actually alive. Shells are a secretion of living things. No, sand was and never will be a living thing in my opinion. Maybe in evolution it was, but science is or equals observation. Since it has not been observed, it is not science. That is why evolution is still a theory.
Yes, paper is boitic. The reason is simple. -Because abiotic is non-living factors ( meaning factors that have never lived before ) Biotic are factors that are living or have lived. Ex. A tree is a living thing. When we cut it down into paper, it dies, but it is still biotic. So,yes: paper is biotic.
Non-living
It is a non living thing. Pie is a thing
A printer is made from plastic and metal, and is a non-living thing.
It is a living thing.