No, "never lived" refers to something that has not experienced life, while "non-living" means something that does not possess life. "Never lived" implies a lack of existence, while "non-living" indicates the absence of life in an existing entity.
A living thing has biological processes such as metabolism, growth, and reproduction, while something that has never lived, such as a rock, does not exhibit these processes. Living things also respond to stimuli and have the ability to adapt to their environment, characteristics that non-living things lack.
the answer is dead why would it be living.....
no... dead means 'to be completely and utterly dead', wheras non living means your not alive, but not not necessarily dead...and you might think that a non-living thing was once made up of living things(such as a leopard jacket) but the non-living thig and its materials were put through a process to become something completely new and different.so it isnt necessarily aline nor is it dead.
Living cells cannot be produced from non-living things like rocks. Cells come from pre-existing cells through processes like cell division. The origin of life is still a topic of scientific debate, but it is generally believed that life emerged from complex chemical reactions in a prebiotic environment.
As far as my knowledge in both biology and geology goes, no. Only living or dead things can have DNA. Rocks are non-living. Non-living and dead may sound similar, but they are two completely different things. Non living things have never lived. Dead things have lived, but are not longer living.
A rock
A living thing has biological processes such as metabolism, growth, and reproduction, while something that has never lived, such as a rock, does not exhibit these processes. Living things also respond to stimuli and have the ability to adapt to their environment, characteristics that non-living things lack.
the answer is dead why would it be living.....
glass is non-living, as it was never alive. if it was made of animal matter, then it would be classed as living, even if it was dead. Sand has never been alive, so it is non-living
Yes, paper is boitic. The reason is simple. -Because abiotic is non-living factors ( meaning factors that have never lived before ) Biotic are factors that are living or have lived. Ex. A tree is a living thing. When we cut it down into paper, it dies, but it is still biotic. So,yes: paper is biotic.
They lived solemnly and non-cautiously.
no... dead means 'to be completely and utterly dead', wheras non living means your not alive, but not not necessarily dead...and you might think that a non-living thing was once made up of living things(such as a leopard jacket) but the non-living thig and its materials were put through a process to become something completely new and different.so it isnt necessarily aline nor is it dead.
Living is something alive, like you, where as non-living is something that is not alive nor dead, like a table, it does not breathe and never has breathed or moved.
All plants are living. They grow, and they die.
who knows,maybe your dreaming.We may never know.......... but maybe someday.
ecosystem
something without DNA, such as a mineral, or a compound (something which never lived),or something with no current positive chemical activity (growth, regeneration) . Examples other non-living things would be, A rock, any element, a dead Llama, Michael Barrymore's swim-team partner, ectect.