It is much easier and simpler to answer in the reverse manner:
They ARE responsible for: directly - for their own actions and indirectly - for the official actions of their subordinates.
false
false
false
false
False
FALSE upon investigation and trial there can be a verdict. due to hierarchy/chain of command - these accusations must be investigated.
The company (the insurer) may be held responsible for the action of its agents regardless of the agents' contracts with the company.
I believe that the Nurenburg War Crimes Trials answered this question.
A commander-in-chief is the highest commanding officer of an armed forces. The title is held concurrently held by the President of the state.
No one man can be held responsible for starting WW2. The leaders of each respective nation may be held responsible for those actions.
The commander responsible for developing a wing instruction for tool control procedures is typically the Wing Commander. This individual oversees the operational and administrative functions of the wing and ensures compliance with safety and operational standards. The Wing Commander may delegate specific responsibilities to subordinates, such as the Maintenance Group Commander or Safety Officer, but ultimate accountability lies with them.
NoBut you may not be criminally responsible, or put another way you may not get sent to jail.Added: However you, and/or your insurance company, WILL be held financially responsible for the the damages and/or injuries you may have caused.