0
What else can I help you with?
A commander may not be held responsible for war crimes committed by subordinates?
false
A commander may not be held responsible for war crimes committed by subordinates under?
false
A commander may not be held responsible for war crimes committed by subordinates under his or her control?
false
A commander may not be held responsible for war crimes committed by subordinates under hisher control?
False
Commander may not be held responsible for war crimes a committed by subordinates under his control?
FALSE upon investigation and trial there can be a verdict. due to hierarchy/chain of command - these accusations must be investigated.
A commander may not be held responsible for?
It is much easier and simpler to answer in the reverse manner:They ARE responsible for: directly - for their own actions and indirectly - for the official actions of their subordinates.
Who may be held responsible for the actions of an agent regardless of the agents contract with the company?
The company (the insurer) may be held responsible for the action of its agents regardless of the agents' contracts with the company.
Who was the man who stared World War 2?
No one man can be held responsible for starting WW2. The leaders of each respective nation may be held responsible for those actions.
What commander is responsible for developing a wing instruction for tool control procedures?
The commander responsible for developing a wing instruction for tool control procedures is typically the Wing Commander. This individual oversees the operational and administrative functions of the wing and ensures compliance with safety and operational standards. The Wing Commander may delegate specific responsibilities to subordinates, such as the Maintenance Group Commander or Safety Officer, but ultimate accountability lies with them.
Is there a law that says if you have a medical condition and have a car accident you wont be held liable?
NoBut you may not be criminally responsible, or put another way you may not get sent to jail.Added: However you, and/or your insurance company, WILL be held financially responsible for the the damages and/or injuries you may have caused.
In certain instances a person may be held criminally responsible irrespective of intent?
True
Are psychopaths responsible for their crimes?
Psychopaths can be held responsible for their crimes, as they are capable of understanding the consequences of their actions and can form intent. While their lack of empathy and emotional regulation may influence their behavior, the legal system often recognizes that individuals with psychopathic traits can still make conscious choices. Ultimately, accountability varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of each case, but many courts view psychopathy as a factor rather than a complete defense against responsibility.
