A narrator who isn't consistent is considered unreliable.
unreliable. An unreliable narrator is a character whose interpretation of events in a story differs from the author's or the reader's. This can create ambiguity and add layers of complexity to the narrative.
unreliable narrator
An example of the intrusive narrator in Jane Eyre is when the narrator interrupts the story to directly address the reader, such as in the opening lines of the novel. The narrator can be considered reliable as their perspective on events is consistent throughout the story. The intrusiveness of the narrator creates a more intimate relationship with the reader, as if the narrator is sharing their thoughts and feelings directly with us.
Because they are big and drafty.
It is
"Steady"
no it isnt, poorper
Yes, a comma should go before the phrase "consistent with" when it is used to introduce additional information in a sentence. For example: "The results were, consistent with previous studies, inconclusive."
The narrator would be considered unreliable. This type of narration can create tension and intrigue for the reader as they try to discern the truth from the narrator's perspective.
No, the narrator in "The Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin is not considered unreliable. The narrator presents the story in a straightforward manner and provides insight into the thoughts and emotions of the protagonist, Mrs. Mallard.
Gneiss Is a rock that is classified into metamorphic. Gneiss is considered rare by people but isnt to rare
No, it is not proper grammar. The correct phrasing is "you and I."
yes. the camaro '10 is considered a muscle car isnt' it?
fluorescent isnt always the best lighting to use a workstation because it produces UV radiation which isnt good for your eye sight