Want this question answered?
In a transverse wave the particle displacement is perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation (at right angles). In a longitudinal wave the particle displacement is parallel to the direction of wave propagation.
I believe that any particle in linear motion must also have some angular momentum because all particles have spin. In the case of a photon the spin, wavelength and angular momentum all vary with the relative linear velocity. So in my point of view time itself is the ratio between relative linear and angular momentum.
Newtons First Law of Motion states that an object with a given momentum will continue to posses that same momentum until the object is acted on by a force in which case it will undergo a change in momentum. Inertia is a measure of an objects tendency to resist a change in momentum. Massive bodies have a large inertia. If a massive body is in motion its momentum is given by the product of the mass and the velocity of that body. Newtons first law says that if a force acts on this body its momentum will change. But since the body has a large inertia this change is small. For example, if a small space pebble collides with a large asteroid that has a constant velocity and thus constant momentum, the force is small relative to the inertia of the asteroid so the momentum only changes a little bit.
Yes, it can. Initially, an object will be accelerating downward (with an acceleration equal to g - f, where f is the force of air resistance). During this period, mass is constant but velocity is continually increasing, so momentum increases as well. However, because f is dependent on v (the speed of the object relative to the air), at a certain velocity, the force of air resistance will equal gravity, and the object will stop accelerating (this velocity is known as "terminal" velocity). At this point, the object will fall with constant speed, and momentum will remain constant.
This question is ill-formed. You do not specify which particle you mean, nor what you mean by negative x-direction. Note that coordinate systems in physics are relative; they have no affect on physics, and can thus be chosen in any convient way. I could define your negative x-direction to be the positive x-direction if I wished to do so.
Without access to the particle and the system to which it is being compared it is impossible to say.
The particle motion in shear waves relative to the energy of the wave is downward.
In a transverse wave the particle displacement is perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation (at right angles). In a longitudinal wave the particle displacement is parallel to the direction of wave propagation.
I believe that any particle in linear motion must also have some angular momentum because all particles have spin. In the case of a photon the spin, wavelength and angular momentum all vary with the relative linear velocity. So in my point of view time itself is the ratio between relative linear and angular momentum.
Relative velocity of A wrt B = V - Vsin30 = V/2Time = distance / speedTime = 2a/VIn reality each particle will follow a curved path and eventually meet at the center of the hexagon.
Newtons First Law of Motion states that an object with a given momentum will continue to posses that same momentum until the object is acted on by a force in which case it will undergo a change in momentum. Inertia is a measure of an objects tendency to resist a change in momentum. Massive bodies have a large inertia. If a massive body is in motion its momentum is given by the product of the mass and the velocity of that body. Newtons first law says that if a force acts on this body its momentum will change. But since the body has a large inertia this change is small. For example, if a small space pebble collides with a large asteroid that has a constant velocity and thus constant momentum, the force is small relative to the inertia of the asteroid so the momentum only changes a little bit.
Yes, it can. Initially, an object will be accelerating downward (with an acceleration equal to g - f, where f is the force of air resistance). During this period, mass is constant but velocity is continually increasing, so momentum increases as well. However, because f is dependent on v (the speed of the object relative to the air), at a certain velocity, the force of air resistance will equal gravity, and the object will stop accelerating (this velocity is known as "terminal" velocity). At this point, the object will fall with constant speed, and momentum will remain constant.
If you jump up, for example, with a momentum of 100 kilogram x meter / second (this can be done by jumping up at a speed of 2 meters/second, if you have a mass of 50 kilograms), then the Earth will recoil by the same amount of momentum - in the opposite direction of course. This follows directly from Conservation of Momentum.
This question is ill-formed. You do not specify which particle you mean, nor what you mean by negative x-direction. Note that coordinate systems in physics are relative; they have no affect on physics, and can thus be chosen in any convient way. I could define your negative x-direction to be the positive x-direction if I wished to do so.
Depending on how you define it. Momentum is always given positive units, but sometimes when considered in a relative view, it can be in a negative direction making the overall value negative too (while mass is always positive, velocity might be in a negative direction where e.g. two masses are moving in opposite directions).
Relative acceleration' occurs when there is no increase in momentum (no transfer of energy takes place) and when the increase in density occurs only because an object is descending into a denser 'space' in the energy field, resulting in a relative size contraction which creates increased density and a corresponding relativistic increase in the measure of how 'energetic' that energy system has become. The acceleration that occurs and the relative increase in velocity are the results of momentum remaining constant as the spatial gradient of the energy field changes, such that as the clock slows down a relative acceleration occurs.
kinetic