answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Firstly, history says that AC power is more dangerous. Thomas Edison was a huge advocate for direct current because it was safer to transport, to demonstrate this fact he electrocuted an elephant on Coney Island in 1903 using AC current (http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/01/dayintech_0104). As for the danger, and I may be wrong about this, but as the current travels through ones body the current spikes, then falls to as it sucums to the resistors. DC power spikes then remains lower, but AC because it is constantly switching spikes many times.

First, I think you have it backwards; AC (Alternating Current) is considered less dangerous than DC (Direct Current) in that, because it alternates, it may allow the victim to release hold of the source of the charge (20-30mA is enough charge to induce rigid paralysis near the site of the charge).

Note too that lethal electrical charge is more often a result of higher amperage than voltage. Static electricty, for example (the stinging zap you get from doorknobs on dry days) is very high voltage, but very low amperage.

Cjonb 17:02, 3 Jun 2008 (UTC)

Also your heart works via a small electrical pulse at around 75 pulses per minute. AC Volts across your heart will make your heart try to adapt the AC frequency which is like 3000 pulses per minute (50Hz). This is called fibrillation and is what makes AC Voltage so dangerous.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: According to my safety notes a lethal voltage is 120vdc or 50vac why is there such a big differential between the two?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp