The main advantage is that C++ programs compile to native machine code and therefore execute many times faster than equivalent Java programs, which compile to byte code suitable for interpretation by the Java virtual machine. C++ is also more efficient since it requires no interpretation (and therefore no interpreter), and can use memory just as efficiently as assembler. The main disadvantage is the code must be compiled separately for each platform. With Java, programs need only be compiled once for any platform.
C can be faster than C++ programs, and definitely faster than Java, since Java is primarily interpreted. C is also somewhat less rigid in definitions as well, not as tightly structured as either C++ or Java can be.
Java is considerably easier than C++.
Java
Java doesn't have pointers. C++ has pointers.
C, C++ and Java are cross-platform languages. NET is for Windows-only.
C++.
No!!!! You do not need to learn c++ for learning java!
java is an advanced object oriented programming language than c++
Of course not.
In C there are functions only, In Java methodsonly (static methods as well), in C++ both.
As we know that java is a plateform independent language and the main advantage of java is that it can support to any operating system and can be executed to any machines without any modifications.Due to the use of class in java it has become more easier to understand the program compared to c plus plus.Hence,java is portable than c plus plus
No extern keyword in Java.