0
After making observations and proposing a hypothesis a scientists next step is usually to?
Moniquemalysa1fb1160
...perform a scientific experiment designed to shed light on the hypothesis.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoAfter making observations and proposing a hypothesis a scientists next step is usually to propose a hypothesis. The third step is to test your hypothesis.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What usually happens after a scientist develops a hypothesis?
According to the scientific method, after a scientist forms a hypothesis, he will make a prediction of the outcome of his experiment, based on his observations.
What is the relationship between a scientific problem and a hypothesis?
A scientific problem is a problem that usually need to be figured out by expirimenting scientifically. A hypothesis is a possible explanation for a set of observations or answer to a scientific question. The hypothesis is usually made on what the expiriment will turn out to be... or what you think will happen. Both involve thinking about what will happen after an expirement. Plz reply!! :)
How do scientists usually state predictions?
A scientific prediction, or hypothesis, is always stated using the "if, then" method. IF this happens, THEN this will result.
How is making scientific observations different from simply looking at or watching something?
There is no difference in the actual observing. Everyone has a hypothesis of what they see; but scientists go beyond and try to ether prove or disprove their hypothesis, and come up with new hypotheses, usually by experimentation, and find one they can prove. Once they can prove a hypothesis, they can then go on to use that knowledge to see more things. So as I said, the observing is the same. Those that have more knowledge, see more.
Can a hypothesis that has been rejected be of any value to scientists?
Yes. But usually a hypothesis (if, then, because statement) is changed overtime to establish a conclusion on the investigation. The point of the collection of the data is to show whether or not the hypothesis was supported, and if not needs to be corrected/modified. Certain parts may still be helpful/kept but in most cases it is changed
What leads to the de develoment of a theory?
The development of a theory usually starts with observations or data that prompt the formulation of a hypothesis. Scientists then conduct experiments or gather more data to test the hypothesis. Through this process, they refine the hypothesis into a theory that can explain and predict phenomena in a particular field.
What usually happens after a scientist develops a hypothesis?
According to the scientific method, after a scientist forms a hypothesis, he will make a prediction of the outcome of his experiment, based on his observations.
What is it called when scientist quantify their observations of their surroundings?
Data is defined as distinct pieces of information, usually formatted in a special way, and are what scientists quantify their observations of their surroundings.
What is the relationship between a scientific problem and a hypothesis?
A scientific problem is a problem that usually need to be figured out by expirimenting scientifically. A hypothesis is a possible explanation for a set of observations or answer to a scientific question. The hypothesis is usually made on what the expiriment will turn out to be... or what you think will happen. Both involve thinking about what will happen after an expirement. Plz reply!! :)
How do scientists usually state predictions?
A scientific prediction, or hypothesis, is always stated using the "if, then" method. IF this happens, THEN this will result.
How is making scientific observations different from simply looking at or watching something?
There is no difference in the actual observing. Everyone has a hypothesis of what they see; but scientists go beyond and try to ether prove or disprove their hypothesis, and come up with new hypotheses, usually by experimentation, and find one they can prove. Once they can prove a hypothesis, they can then go on to use that knowledge to see more things. So as I said, the observing is the same. Those that have more knowledge, see more.
Can a hypothesis that has been rejected be of any value to scientists?
Yes. But usually a hypothesis (if, then, because statement) is changed overtime to establish a conclusion on the investigation. The point of the collection of the data is to show whether or not the hypothesis was supported, and if not needs to be corrected/modified. Certain parts may still be helpful/kept but in most cases it is changed
8 Observational records that contain significant detailed information are usually in what?
Scientists commonly keep a journal of observations during an experiment. They use these observations to justify their conclusions during the writing process.
A hypothesis about a work of literature is usually based on what about the work?
A hypothesis about a work of literature is usually based on an attempt to explain or interpret a specific aspect of the work. It is typically formed by analyzing textual evidence, characters, themes, or symbols in the literature to make a prediction or assertion about its meaning or significance.
What does one ask when proposing engagement to woman?
Usually "Will you marry me?" .
What is statistical test of hypothesis?
A statistical hypothesis test will usually be performed by inductively comparing results of experiments or observations. The number or amount of comparisons will generally dictate the statistical test to use. The researcher is basically making a statement and assuming that it is either correct (the hypothesis - H1) or assuming that it is incorrect (the null hypothesis - H0) and testing that assumption within a predetermined significance level - the alpha.
In animal fields studies why do the scientists usually try to work without making the animals aware that humans are present?
Because , animal field studies help the scientists provide data , and work with the hypothesis
