Logical
When reaching conclusions based on evidence, it is important to consider the reliability and quality of the evidence, as well as any potential biases that may be present. It is also crucial to follow a systematic and logical process of analysis to ensure that the conclusions are well-founded and supported by the evidence. Communication of the conclusions should be clear and transparent, highlighting the key findings and the reasoning behind them.
If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.
If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.
These should be based on some evidence but all to often people draw conclusions based on prejudices.
They rely on there conclusions based on observations.
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
It means to make some hypotheses about an event or events. These should be based on some evidence but all to often people draw conclusions based on prejudices.
evidence that is found in the story
evidence from the text
they're based on evidence & data...yeah, pretty much obvious.
Conclusions are based upon prior research and evidence gathered. In a written work, a conclusion will be preceded or followed by the research upon which that conclusion is based.
Bayesian analysis involves updating beliefs about the probability of different outcomes based on new evidence. For example, in medical research, Bayesian analysis can be used to estimate the effectiveness of a new treatment based on prior knowledge and new clinical trial data. By incorporating prior beliefs and updating them with new evidence, Bayesian analysis provides a more robust and flexible framework for making decisions and drawing conclusions.