true
no they are not. only 80 to 85% are terrorists
CS is a computer game. CS is short for Counter Strike. In this game there will usually be two teams. The Counter-terrorists and the Terrorists. The primary objective for each team is to kill all the members of the other team, But there are other ways to win. In certain maps there will be hostages. If the counter-terrorists rescues all hostages or kills all terrorists the counter-terrorists win. If not the terrorists win. In other maps terrorists will be able to deploy bombs. If the bomb is successfully detonated or the terrorists kill all the counter-terrorists, the terrorists win. If the bomb is not detonated, or if the counter-terrorist are able to defuse it, or kill all terrorist before the bomb is deployed, the counter-terrorists win.
Are there any new terrorists? All over the world my friend. All over the world.
An example of prejudice caused by inductive reasoning could be assuming that all members of a particular group are lazy because you have observed a few individuals from that group who were not motivated. This generalization based on limited observations can lead to unfair bias and discrimination against the entire group.
no
Not all but very few
Because if you release terrorists, they can travel all over the world and harm more people. They are called terrorists because they cause "terror".
Terrorists use all sorts of weapons in attacks. A tried and true favorite of terrorists are bombs, guns, and knives. These are also the tried and true favorites of every army.
While there are larger groups within a number of geographical areas, terrorists and terrorist activies are spread throughout the world.
A considerable number, though this cannot really be measured.
to destroy all the mexican terrorists.
Maybe they are forced to do it or chosen all alternative options to get heard verbally but have come down to a last resort of choosing this occupation