Want this question answered?
Thomas Jefferson wrote the Ordinance of 1784 which was significantly different from the Ordinance of 1787(A.K.A. the Northwest Ordinance). although most of the ideas from the Ordinance of 1784 were carried over into the revised document, Thomas Jefferson was not involved in writing the Ordinance of 1787 except for leaving behind a framework for others to use.
As part of the northwest ordinance the first state to be created was Ohio, although the name of the remaining area was changed to Indiana Territory. Also included were one third of Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana.
Northwest Ordinance, it allowed that every new state made, had the same rights guaranteed that other states had. Issued in 1480's i believe
An "act of admission" by Congress is required to grant statehood. The original acts that allowed new states were under the Articles of Confederation. The "Ordinance of 1784" and the "Northwest Ordinance" (1787) established the principle of forming new states rather than the expansion of existing ones. The Constitution adopted the principle that states could neither split nor merge (although this was subsequently allowed with West Virginia). The Enabling Act of 1802 allowed Ohio to form a state, and set the pattern for future statehood for parts of US territories.
Although originally a supporter, Quincy opposed westward expansion by 1843 because of the consequent expansion of slavery into Texas.
Expansion cards are generally installed in PCI or PCI-e slots on the motherboard, although it would depend on which type of expansion card you are referring to.
Although ordnance violations are TECHNICALLY misdemeanors, they seldom if ever appear on background investigations.
yes it does, it can have documentry and facts although it
No it did not influence other revolutions although some wars did start.
Greeks to a small extent. The Jews were another major group to resist Roman culture.
Although prohibitionists were defeated in 1933, they remained strong enough to influence legislation for decades and that influence can still be felt today.
Yes, although they may not be able to identify it as alcohol after your breathalyzer test if they test you for MJ they will charge you with DUI (driving under the INFLUENCE).