An act is universalizable if it is able to be applied to all people at all times.
An act of goodness or evil depends on the person. Depending on which act you refer to, may or may not be universal.
DEONTOLOGY100% Sure
The first formulation of Kant's categorical imperative "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."
That's Kant's system of ethics. One must act according to a maxim which it is coherent to wish to be a universal law. I'm paraphrasing here, but that's the gist of it.
Kant's theory of Moral Imperatives is based around the idea of good actions being those that could be universal and not lead to negative/self-contradictory results.
Universalizable means that something can be applied or extended to all situations or conditions without exception. It suggests that a principle or rule can be universally accepted and applied by everyone.
Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, argued that for an action to be moral, it must be universalizable. In other words, if everyone in a similar situation could act in the same way without contradiction, then the action is considered morally permissible. This concept is central to Kant's deontological ethical theory known as the categorical imperative.
The act that prevented supplies from being shipped to Boston was called the Coercive Act. This act also closed down the Boston harbor.
Caught in the Act of Not Being Awesome was created on 2005-03-03.
the being a horrible president act
no it is not it is being good to god
no they act naturally to them they are being totally n0rmal