That's Kant's system of ethics. One must act according to a maxim which it is coherent to wish to be a universal law. I'm paraphrasing here, but that's the gist of it.
DEONTOLOGY100% Sure
Kant's theory of Moral Imperatives is based around the idea of good actions being those that could be universal and not lead to negative/self-contradictory results.
The first formulation of Kant's categorical imperative "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."
An act of goodness or evil depends on the person. Depending on which act you refer to, may or may not be universal.
An act is universalizable if it is able to be applied to all people at all times.
Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, argued that for an action to be moral, it must be universalizable. In other words, if everyone in a similar situation could act in the same way without contradiction, then the action is considered morally permissible. This concept is central to Kant's deontological ethical theory known as the categorical imperative.
How people react to what was done. ~Apex
The Arrhenius theory is limited because it focuses only on substances that produce H+ or OH- ions in water. It does not account for molecules that can act as acids or bases without dissociating in water, or for reactions that occur in non-aqueous solvents. Additionally, the Arrhenius theory does not explain acid-base reactions that do not involve proton transfer.
Act utilitarianism is a specific form of consequentialism, which is a broader ethical theory that judges the morality of an action based on its outcomes. Act utilitarianism specifically focuses on maximizing overall happiness or utility in each individual situation, while consequentialism more broadly considers the consequences of actions in determining their ethical value.
of Espouse
The income tax act focuses its concern on total income and the income tax rule focuses on which types of income are taxable. That is the biggest difference between the two.
Both are about relationships between principle and agent, such as owners hiring a manager to make decisions.The agency theory believes that managers if left unattended will make decisions based on self-interest.In contrast, the stewardship theory believes that if given authority andresponsibility, the agent can act on behalf of the principle.It is a difference in perspectives, and the result is that companies give high incentives so that managers act in the interests of owners (agency theory)