answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

inductive-reasoning

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago
That is wrong
User Avatar

ESME JOHNSON

Lvl 1
3y ago
inductive argument
User Avatar

stolen

Lvl 1
3y ago
right
User Avatar

Jesus Christ

Lvl 1
3y ago
Y'ALL NlGGAS CONFUSING ASF
User Avatar

Luke Robinson

Lvl 1
2y ago
an inductive arguement
User Avatar

Maura Leo

Lvl 1
1y ago
DEDUCTIVE REASONING
More answers
User Avatar

Lucy Heartfelia

Lvl 4
3y ago

Apex deductive reasoning

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago
Correct
User Avatar

stolen

Lvl 1
3y ago
wrong
User Avatar

Luke Robinson

Lvl 1
2y ago
wrong
User Avatar

Anthony Abac

Lvl 1
2y ago
Correct for me
User Avatar

TROY JONES

Lvl 1
1y ago
correct

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

This is a type of reasoning called inductive reasoning, as opposed to deductive reasoning which applies a general idea to a specific circumstance.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

inductive

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

inductive reasoning

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Inductive.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: An argument that starts from a more specific idea to reach a more general conclusion is known as?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about English Language Arts

What is the verb for argument?

Arguement means a uncertain conversation that starts when two or more than two pople does not agree with other statements.


What does propel the action mean in literary terms?

it means that when the conflicts or the rising part occurs it starts to lead to a conclusion


What are the five principle steps to analyzing an argument?

In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process: 1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact. 2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence. 3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.


When should a noun be written in a big letter what do you call this noun?

A proper noun always starts with a capital letter.A proper noun is the name of a specific person, place, or thing.Examples: Vincent Van Gogh, Paris, OreoA common noun is capitalized only when it is the first word in a sentence.A common noun is a general word for a person, place, or thing.Examples: artist, city, cookie


What is the definition of divergent question?

convergent questions are questions with a specific answer. They lead you to an expected result or answer. Questions usually starts with what, where and when. example: what is your name? what is in that container? what animal having 2 legs?

Related questions

What is an argument that starts from a specific idea to a general conclusion?

Inductive.


What is An argument that starts from a general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?

A deductive argument starts from a general principle or premise and uses it to logically conclude a more specific statement. This type of argument moves from the general to the specific, showing how the premise leads to a certain conclusion through valid reasoning.


What type of argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?

A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.


What is an argument known as that starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?

That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.


What is a argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion?

Inductive.


What is an argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a genral conclusion?

An argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion is known as inductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, specific observations or data points are used to draw a broader conclusion that is considered probable, but not necessarily definitive. Inductive reasoning allows for the generalization of patterns or trends based on specific instances.


What is a type of argument that starts from a specific idea then reaches a conclusion?

inductive reasoning


An argument that starts from a more specific idea to reach a more general conclusion is known as .?

inductive-reasoning


How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?

For a deductive argument, you start with a general premise and apply it to a specific case to reach a certain conclusion. In contrast, an inductive argument begins with specific observations and generalizes to a broader theory or principle. Both types aim to support a conclusion with appropriate reasoning and logic.


What kind of reasoning moves from general to specific facts in order to reach conclusion?

Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions. This type of reasoning starts with a hypothesis or theory and tests it against evidence to reach a logical conclusion.


Why is the passage an example of inductive reasoning?

The passage is an example of inductive reasoning because it starts with specific observations or patterns (the data) about a few individuals (the swans observed) and then draws a general conclusion (all swans are white) based on these observations. Inductive reasoning uses specific instances to make generalizations or predictions.


What is deductive explanation?

Deductive explanation is a process of reasoning that starts with general principles or premises and applies them to specific situations to arrive at a conclusion. It involves drawing logical inferences to demonstrate how the premises necessarily lead to the conclusion. It is a top-down approach that aims to demonstrate the validity of a conclusion based on the truth of the premises.