An argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion is known as inductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, specific observations or data points are used to draw a broader conclusion that is considered probable, but not necessarily definitive. Inductive reasoning allows for the generalization of patterns or trends based on specific instances.
A deductive argument starts from a general principle or premise and uses it to logically conclude a more specific statement. This type of argument moves from the general to the specific, showing how the premise leads to a certain conclusion through valid reasoning.
A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.
That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.
Inductive.
inductive-reasoning
Inductive.
Inductive.
inductive reasoning
That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.
inductive-reasoning
A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.
For a deductive argument, you start with a general premise and apply it to a specific case to reach a certain conclusion. In contrast, an inductive argument begins with specific observations and generalizes to a broader theory or principle. Both types aim to support a conclusion with appropriate reasoning and logic.
inductive-reasoning
* quarrel
The answer to have an argument is to keep talking back to the person no matter what. Then they'll say something back and that's when an argument starts.
The end
Conclusion.