Want this question answered?
There is a vast employment opportunity in South Dakota if, and only if you have the correct combination of education, prior experience and training, skill and other board qualifications essential for the task at hand. Because you did five years as a Resident in Neurosurgery at John Hopkins does not qualify you to be a plumber. A degree in Animal Husbandry before gaining a Harvard MBA does not make you an expert burger flipper. South Dakota suffers from a drain of the best and the brightest who seek employment out of state. Inheriting the family farm is no longer the continuation of a family dynasty, it is often the start of a mental health problem.
Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, Minnesota, Indiana, South Dakota, Kansas, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Missouri are the top ten. (Data based on 2009 crop year)
Varies greatly depending on location, if there is currently any buildings on it, local economy etc. A vacant acre of land in the back woods of North Dakota is going to be drastically cheaper than an acre of land in downtown New York City with a multi-million dollar skyscraper on it.
Check in with your local board of Realtors to find out which states your state issued license has receprocity with. If you have an Illinois License, you can practice in Kentucky, Missouri, Nebraska, South Dakota, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, and Georgia. Technically, you could be licensed in all states, there is no limit.
It's all about supply , demand, and Profit. That is not what anyone in politics is looking for. The fact is we make a ton of money on the taxes from this product. More then the oil companies do. Under the current administration we are doing everything we can to cause the price of fuel to go up, both through taxes and capping production. If you want oil to go down, start allowing the drilling of oil off shore, start using the 400 plus year supply we have in Colorado and North Dakota. The cost of oil is rising because that is what our current government wants to happen.
North Dakota is ranked 2nd behind Kansas in total wheat production
Jeffrey M. Olson has written: 'Inventory of potential irrigation development in central North Dakota' -- subject(s): Irrigation
According to the USDA, North Dakota does not produce a "reportable quantity" of millet. They only show Colorado, Nebraska, and South Dakota with any millet production.
North Dakota's production of corn has increased to 249.3 million bushels in 2010-2011, which is five times the 1991 production. The driver of that increase is the production of ethanol for the transportation industry. It still ranks number thirteen among the fifty US States.
Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Nebraska. Missiouri, Indiana, Ohio, South Dakota, North Dakota, Kansas
North Dakota is the largest production of soy beans
"North Dakota" or "North Dakota 2012" Or the map title could reflect what the map is about. For example: "North Dakota Bodies of Water" or "North Dakota Highways".
Yes. North Dakota is now (2011) the 4th largest producer of petroleum in the US.
It should. The 5.9L Magnum is available as a factory option in most or all years of Dakota production.
California, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
Kansas and North Dakota are the top two US states in wheat production.
Yes, they grow honey in Fargo, North Dakota. More specifically, honey is grown in the Fargo, North Dakota area, especially in the Red River Valley. North Dakota is the nation's leader of honey production.