Are your referring to the terms, "Inadmissable" or perhaps the phrase, "Fruit of The Poisoned Tree?"
Also known as the exclusionary rule.
The right to an attorney does not apply to civil cases, but applies to all criminal cases.
Julian R. Hanley has written: 'Introduction to criminal evidence and court procedure' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Criminal Evidence 'Criminal justice processes and procedures' -- subject(s): Administration of Criminal justice, Criminal justice, Administration of, Criminal law, Criminal procedure 'Selected cases for legal aspects of criminal evidence'
John Kaplan has written: 'Criminal law' -- subject(s): Cases, Criminal law 'Criminal justice: introductory cases and materials' -- subject(s): Administration of Criminal justice, Cases, Criminal justice, Administration of 'Marijuana, the new prohibition' -- subject(s): Drugs, Drug abuse, Law and legislation, Marijuana 'Basic materials on criminal evidence' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Evidence, Criminal 'The court-martial of the Kaohsiung defendants' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Riots, Trials (Riots), Courts-martial and courts of inquiry, Trials (Sedition), History 'The trial of Jack Ruby' 'Criminal law' -- subject(s): Cases, Criminal law
Burr W. Jones has written: 'Jones on evidence, civil and criminal' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Evidence (Law) 'The law of evidence in civil cases' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law), Civil procedure 'The law of evidence'
Criminal court proceedings are conducted in a courthouse where evidence for and against the defendant is presented. The jury will make a decision and the judge will pass the verdict.
Stephen A. Saltzburg has written: 'Outline on attorney-client privilege' -- subject(s): Confidential communications, Lawyers, Attorney and client '1997 Supplement to American Criminal Procedure' 'August 1985 cumulative supplement to Federal rules of evidence manual' 'Washington evidence trial book' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law) 'Federal rules of evidence manual' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law), United States '1985 supplement to American criminal procedure' 'American criminal procedure' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Cases 'Federal Rules of Evidence Manual February 1989 Cumulative Supplement' 'Federal rules of evidence manual' -- subject(s): United States, Evidence (Law) '1996 Supplement to American Criminal Procedure' '1984 Supplement to American Criminal Procedure, Cases and Commentary, 1984' 'Cases and Commentary, 1993 Supplement to American Criminal Procedure (American Casebook Ser.)' 'Trial tactics' -- subject(s): Trial practice 'The Federal Rules of Evidence Manual, February 1999 Cumulative Supplement' 'American criminal procedure' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Cases
Fred Edward Inbau has written: 'Criminal law and its administration' -- subject(s): Cases, Criminal procedure, Criminal law 'Criminal interrogation and confessions' -- subject(s): Police questioning, Confession (Law), Forensic psychology 'Scientific police investigation' -- subject(s): Criminal investigation 'Criminal law for the police' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Police, Handbooks, manuals, Criminal law 'Cases and comments on criminal justice' -- subject(s): Cases, Criminal procedure, Criminal law 'Self-incrimination' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Criminal investigation, Criminals, Evidence, Criminal, Identification, United States
Most criminal cases result in a plea bargain or trial verdict, while civil cases often settle out of court. Ultimately, the outcome depends on the available evidence, legal arguments, and decisions made by the parties involved.
The Exclusionary Rule's purpose is to keep certain evidence from being used against you in a criminal trial. Police procedure in gathering evidence against you is heavily dictated by cases interpreting the Fourth Amendment. Evidence gathered in violation of your Constitutional rights is subject to the Exclusionary Rule.
When cases are completed, they are closed. If a case is reinstated, that means that it is going to be opened again. This happens a lot with criminal cases when new evidence is found.
No, Just as in criminal cases all potential witnesses are excluded from the hearing or trial until their turn comes to testify. This is so that their testimony is not 'tainted' or influenced by what they hear during anyone else's testimony.
district courts are responsible for determining the facts of a case. They take both criminal and civil cases. In a criminal case, a district court will decide if a person is guilty or innocent based on the evidence presented.