Yes they are as well as with the 302 and 351w engines
The 1964½ Ford Mustang did not have a 289, it had the 260 (which was rated at 164 hp). If your car has a 289 it is either a 1965 or does not have the original engine. A good way to tell a 1964½ from a 1965 is whether it has a metal dashboard or a padded dash.
orden de encendido ford mustang 289
17^(2) = 289 .
The average is 289.
260 + ((0 +42 + 45)/3) = 260 + 87/3 = 260 + 29 = 289
The point gap for a 65 mustang that had a 260/289 V8 with a single point, vacuum advance distributor was .014-.016. A car with a 170/200 6cyl motor with the single point vacuum advance distributor was .024-.026, and for a car that had the high performance 289 with the dual point, centrifugal advance distributor it was .019-.021
The 1964 1/2 Ford Mustang came with 3 engines. 170 Cu. In. Inline 6 cylinder with 101 h.p. 260 Cu. In. V8 with 164 h.p. 289 Cu. In. V8 with 210 h.p.
They should as they are the same block.
289 with 2 barrel carb has 200 h.p.289 with 4 barrel carb has 225 h.p. 289 High Performance has 271 h.p.
A 1965 Shelby Mustang , 289 V8 , was rated at 306 BHP
C = 289 CID (2V)K = 289 CID (High Performance)A = 289 CID (4V)T = 200 CID
depends on which bolt.