In most cases yes. They are usually high performance first of all, and they are really expensive to fix.
extreemly expensive
Because they are expensive to repair if they have an accident.
Yes it is significantly more expensive to insure a nice classic car than a newer car. It is because they are more expensive to replace. you may have to pay a few hundred bucks a month to insure the car.
Im not sure which is the most expensive, but rare, limited, classic cars can be expensive, lets take the McLaren F1 car for example, this is a rare, expensive, limited car wihch cost more to insure than buying the car itself. Mainly it is expensive to insure powerfull, sporty cars.
historic buildding and vacant building are expensive to insure. Vacant historic buildings are probably the most expensive. Occupied homes in States which are not flood prone are the cheapest to insure.
There is no particular make or model of car that tends to be less expensive to insure it is the class of vehicle that makes a difference. SUVs and sports/high performance cars tend to be the most expensive to insure, while economy sedans tend to be less expensive. Sport cars like the Acura Integra and Mitsubishi Lancer EVO tend to be really expensive to insure compared to a Toyota Corolla or Chevrolet Cavalier.
Germany
The Kawasaki motorbikes are extremely expensive not only to own but also to insure. But if you have the sports edition it is going cost you a goood bit more to get insurance on it.
Imported cars are generally more expensive to insure. This is due to having to pay for the extra cost of shipping over parts in case an accident occurs.
No. Generally speaking, used cars are actually less expensive to insure than new cars. This varies greatly depending on model however.
i guess audis...
YES