Want this question answered?
No fluorocarbon refrigerants pose harm to the ozone layer. Only molecules with chlorine or bromine pose a hazard.
HCFC's are being used nowadays. These are the refrigerants that do not damage ozone.
Nowadays we have alternatives for CFC's. These are called HCFC's.
CFC's are ozone depleting substances. HCFC's are an alternative to CFC's.
HCFC do not destroy ozone. They are an alternative to CFC's.
The chlorine from chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), (freons). The bromine from bromofluorocarbons (halons). Carbon tetrachloride and methylchloroform (found so far in increasing amounts at lower altitudes of the atmosphere).
They include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, sulfur hexafluoride and CFC-12 and HCFC-22. The last 2 are chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
They were made and used because they are extremely stable, they had useful gas-to-liquid transition temperatures, and they were cheap (fluorine production is dirty, dangerous, and hence expensive). They contribute to ozone depletion because they are so stable they can only be brokne down in the intense radiation of the ozone layer, and their chlorine payload is released to do its dirty deed over and over.
Pronounced "KLOR-oh-FLOR-oh-kar-bunz" (mostly fluoromethane refrigerants such as Freon, abbreviated CFC's; along with hydrochlorofluorocarbons, HCFC's, they are implicated in upper atmospheric ozone destruction)
Since November 15, 1995
most manufacturers converted to foams using HCFC-141b as the blowing agent. HCFCs are an ozone depleting substance (ODS), but considered much less so than CFCs and so were singled out as the best transition blowing agent
CFC's and HCFC's