Sure they can. Witnesses want the best in medical management. They only refuse transfusions of whole blood or the four main components of blood because blood is sacred. There are alternatives to blood transfusions which are better and safer.
Interestingly, Jehovah's Witnesses request for non blood medical management has led to the gold standard in medicine now. the US govt has now earmarked millions of dollars for its military doctors to be trained in bloodless surgeries because they are found to be cost effective, safer than blood transfusions, and possible in disaster areas during disaster relief. You can thank Jehovah's Witnesses for their persistence to insist on the best medicine without compromising Bible standards.
to have what?
This is hearsay, which is a secondary source of information that is not allowed.
They're allowed to cross-examine him. The witness is called to the stand - and gives their account of what they saw. The opposing counsel then has the chance to question the witness - in an attempt to disprove their evidence.
Cross-examination. They will ask the witness questions that seek to discredit the opposition's case.
Cross-examination. They will ask the witness questions that seek to discredit the opposition's case.
Although there is the possibility that Eminem could be a Jehovah's Witness, it is very unlikely. Eminem use of bad language suggests that he is not a Jehovah's Witness because cursing is not allowed,
Cross-examine.
If the spouse is not a Jehovah's Witness, i.e like every other non-Witness, then yes of course they don't need anyone's allowance whether they can or cannot receive gifts at birthdays or Christmas.
An opinion witness is a witness who is allowed to provide their opinions or interpretations on matters within their expertise during legal proceedings. This type of witness is typically called upon to offer specialized knowledge or insights that the average person may not possess.
One lawyer asking questions during the other lawyer's examination of a witness
Yes, leading questions are usually allowed during cross-examination. The purpose of cross-examination is to challenge the witness's testimony and credibility, and leading questions can help steer the witness toward a particular line of questioning or point.
I believe that any lawyer would consider this to be a conflict of interest, and not allowed.