I think Emerald is, Although they say emerald for its rarity and its durability.Diamond is just famous because of minecraft and its durability.
yes
It is true that rubies, sapphires, and emeralds are more rare than diamonds. The reason is that the elements which make up rubies, sapphires, and emeralds which give them their color are more rare in the environment than carbon which is what diamonds are made of.
no,emeralds cost about 350,000 and blood rubies cost 126,000
are diamonds more valuable than emeralds
If you really think about it, diamonds are way more expensive than a emerald, i would say that diamonds are better, but not that emeralds are ugly
more than €3000
Diamonds are becoming the common choice in engagement rings. They say the bigger the diamond the more you love. Other than diamonds, other gemstones such as rubies, emeralds and sapphires are used in rings as well.
no
As with any fine gemstone the quality of the stone is what goes in to play when determining the value of a stone. What also has to be determined is if the stone is natural or lab created and if the stone has been heat treated to enrish the color. Ruby, by far, has more value than that of a sapphire. The stone in its' natural state is more rare than sapphire. A true red, that is a blood red ruby with out flaws is rare and very valuable once it has been determined that the stone has not been heat treated. Sapphires are available in many colors and some of the more rare colors can have more value than the blue. Green, yellow, pink, white. Medium rich to light blue sapphires have more value than the darker more common sapphires.
Emeralds have cheaper options then diamonds but both types of rings can be very expensive. Emerald rings range from a couple hundred to thousands of dollars.
gold
That would depend greatly on your idea of expensive. They are not as expensive as higher quality and rarer stones like diamonds and emeralds. Typically, cubic zirconias are a less expensive choice than diamonds and are sustituted for such.
Brazil.